Bowden et al v. City of New York et al

Filing 163

OPINION AND ORDER re: 128 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Corrections Officer Salmon, City Of New York, Corrections Captain Biggs, Corrections Officer Reid (Shield No. 17728), Corrections Officer Smith (Shield No. 8447), Co rrections Officer Michael White. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Doc. No. 128. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan United States Circuit Judge Sitting By Designation on 1/2/2019) (ne)

Download PDF
Cir. 2000). But while it is true that "responding to the order of a superior officer" may serve to immunize an inferior officer from suit, such situations tend to arise where the responding officer is not privy to the details or circumstances that gave rise to the order. See Bilda, 211 F.3d at 175 ("Upon receiving an explicit order to go to the home and seize the animal, [the subordinate officers] had every reason to think that Captain Tyler had secured a warrant or concluded (possibly based on exigent circumstances unknown to [the subordinate officers]) that one was u1mecessary)."). Clearly, not every order from a superior officer entitles a defendant to qualified immunity. Here, Defendants do not explain how Biggs' order could reasonably have led her subordinates to "conclude that the necessary legal justification" for pepper spraying Knight existed, given that - according to Knight - Reid and Smith had first-hand knowledge of the relevant circumstances, and were aware that Knight was already in handcuffs and compliant, and therefore posed no threat to the officers. Thus, Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity at this stage of the litigation. IV. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Doc. No. 128. Dated: January 2, 2019 New York, New York UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Sitting by Designation 10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?