Van Duppen v. Mylan N.V. et al
Filing
165
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 7/10/2020) (js)
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 37
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
In re Mylan N.V. Securities Litigation
Case No. 1:16-CV-07926 (JPO)
MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC.
Case No. 1:19-CV-01799 (JPO)
vs.
Mylan N.V., et al.
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority
Case No. 1:20-cv-01342 (JPO)
vs.
Mylan N.V., et al.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Discovery requests and subpoenas served in the coordinated above-captioned actions (the
“Actions”) may call for the production of trade secret or other confidential research, development,
or commercial information within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), or other private or
competitively sensitive information for which special protection from public disclosure and from
use for any purpose other than litigating the Actions is warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby
stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”) pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and Fed. R. Evid. 502(d). This Order shall supersede the Stipulated Protective
Order entered on July 3, 2019 in In re Mylan N.V. Securities Litigation, No. 16-cv-07926 (JPO)
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 2 of 37
(S.D.N.Y.) (ECF No. 121) and the Stipulated Protective Order entered on July 9, 2020 in Abu Dhabi
Investment Authority v. Mylan N.V., No. 20-v-01342 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y.) (ECF No. 27).
1.
DEFINITIONS
1.1.
Party: any party in the Actions, including all of its officers, directors, principals,
employees, Consultants, Experts and Outside Counsel, as defined below.
1.2.
Non-Party: any entity that is not a named party to the Actions.
1.3.
Discovery Material: all documents, items or other information—regardless of the
medium or manner generated, stored or maintained—including, among other things, testimony,
interrogatory responses, transcripts, depositions and deposition exhibits, responses to requests to
admit, recorded or graphic matter, electronically stored information (“ESI”), tangible things
and/or other information produced, given, exchanged by or obtained from any Party or NonParty during discovery in the Actions that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses
to discovery in the Actions (whether produced pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34,
subpoena or otherwise). This includes any material produced, filed or served by any Party or
person during discovery in the Actions, or any information included in any such material.
Discovery Material produced, exchanged or disclosed in the Actions shall be used only for the
purposes of the Actions, and not for any other proceeding or business, competitive, personal,
private, public or other purpose.
1.4.
CONFIDENTIAL Information or Items: Discovery Material that has not been
made public by the Producing Party, or Designating Party if different than the Producing Party,
and that the Producing Party, or Designating Party if different than the Producing Party,
reasonably and in good faith believes qualifies for protection under standards developed under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), including: (a) non-public, confidential, proprietary or
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 3 of 37
commercial information not readily ascertainable through lawful means by the public or the
Receiving Party; (b) information that is commercially sensitive, including, without limitation,
confidential research or business development information; (c) information kept confidential
pursuant to law or regulation; (d) material that identifies an individual in any manner and relates
to the past, present or future care, services or supplies regarding the physical or mental health or
condition of such individual, the provision of health care to such individual or the payment for
the provision of health care to such individual, and shall also include without limitation
“protected health information” as such term is defined by the Standards for Privacy of
Individually Identifiable Health Information, 45 C.F.R. parts 160 and 164, promulgated pursuant
to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), including prescriptions,
prescription notes, prescription records, prescription drug event reports, medical bills, claims
forms, charge sheets, medical records, medical charts, test results, notes, dictation, invoices,
itemized billing statements, remittance advice forms, explanations of benefits, checks, notices,
requests, summaries or oral communications; and (e) an individual’s family, financial, medical,
personnel records or other highly sensitive or personally identifying information.
1.5.
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Information or Items: Discovery Material that
contains competitive or highly sensitive information and which the Designating Party reasonably
and in good faith believes is “CONFIDENTIAL” as set forth under Paragraph 1.4 above, such as,
inter alia: (a) trade secrets; (b) confidential research, development, testing and studies relating
to drug products; (c) sensitive financial or strategic commercial information; (d) material or
information in possession of a Party or person concerning which said Party or person has an
independent obligation of confidentiality to a Party, Non-Party or person; (e) information
relating to past, current or future pharmaceutical products other than the generic pharmaceutical
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 4 of 37
products at issue in the Actions; (f) claims and reimbursement data; (g) information protected by
foreign, federal or state privacy laws; and (h) agreements with third parties. In addition, with
regard to subparagraphs (a), (b), (c) and (e), the Designating Party must also reasonably and in
good faith believe that disclosure of this information is likely to cause harm to its competitive
position.
1.6.
OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Information or Items: Discovery Material
that contains highly competitive or highly sensitive information and which the Designating Party
reasonably and in good faith believes is: (a) “CONFIDENTIAL” as set forth under Paragraph
1.4 above or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” as set forth under Paragraph 1.5 above; and either
(b) contains information, the disclosure of which is likely to have a significant effect on current
or future (i) business strategies or decisions, (ii) product plans or development or (iii) pricing
(including, but not limited to credits, discounts, returns, allowances, rebates and charge backs);
or (c) was previously produced in a related matter with an OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
designation.
The Parties intend that the OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY designation will be used
only under these limited circumstances.
1.7.
Receiving Party: a Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing
1.8.
Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Discovery Material.
1.9.
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that
Party.
it or another Party or Non-Party produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 5 of 37
1.10.
Protected Material: any Discovery Material that is designated as
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY.
1.11.
Outside Counsel: attorneys, as well as their regular and temporary support staffs,
including but not limited to attorneys, paralegals, secretaries, law clerks and investigators, who
are not employees of a Party but who are retained to represent or advise a Party in the Actions.
1.12.
In House Counsel: attorneys and other personnel employed by or on behalf of a
Party to perform legal functions, as well as their regular and temporary support staffs, including
but not limited to attorneys, paralegals, secretaries, law clerks and investigators.
1.13.
Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and In House Counsel.
1.14.
Expert and/or Consultant: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a
matter pertinent to the Actions, along with his or her employees and support personnel, who has
been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in the
Actions, and who is not a current employee of a Party.
1.15.
Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services
(e.g., copying, organizing, filing, coding, converting, storing, retrieving data in any form or
media or designing programs for handling data connected with the Actions, including the
performance of such duties in relation to a computerized litigation support system, etc.) who
have been retained by a Party or its Counsel to provide litigation support services in the Actions,
and who are not current employees of a Party, and their employees and subcontractors.
2.
SCOPE OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
2.1.
This Order shall apply to all Discovery Material.
2.2.
Nothing herein shall impose any restriction on the use or disclosure by a party of
its own documents or information.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 6 of 37
2.3.
The parties agree that this Stipulated Protective Order will constitute a Qualified
Protective Order under 45 C.F.R. 164.512(e), whereby the order (a) prohibits the parties from
using or disclosing protected health information for any purpose other than the litigation or
proceeding for which such information was requested and (b) requires the return to the covered
entity or destruction of protected health information (including all copies made) at the end of the
litigation or proceeding.
3.
CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS (THREE-TIER)
3.1.
Each Party and any Non-Party shall have the right to designate any Discovery
Material as confidential and subject to this Order, by marking such Material as
“CONFIDENTIAL”, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” or “OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY”
in accordance with Paragraphs 4.1 through 4.5 of this Order. It shall be the duty of the Party or
Non-Party who seeks to invoke protection under this Order to give notice, as set forth below, of
the Discovery Material designated as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or
OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY. The duty of the Parties and of all other persons bound by
this Order to maintain the confidentiality of the Discovery Material so designated shall
commence with such notice.
3.2.
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES
ONLY Discovery Material, shall include: (a) all copies, extracts and complete or partial
summaries prepared from such CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE
COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material; (b) portions of deposition transcripts and exhibits
thereto that contain, summarize or reflect the content of any such CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material; (c) portions of
briefs, memoranda or any other writings filed with the Court and exhibits thereto that contain,
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 7 of 37
summarize or reflect the content of any such CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or
OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material; and (d) written discovery responses
and answers that contain, summarize or reflect the content of any such CONFIDENTIAL,
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material.
3.3.
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and OUTSIDE COUNSEL
EYES ONLY Discovery Material shall not include: (a) information in the public domain at the
time of disclosure, provided that if only part of the contents of particular CONFIDENTIAL,
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material is in
the public domain, the remaining contents shall remain subject to this Order; (b) information the
Receiving Party can show was in its possession prior to the time of disclosure; (c) information
that becomes a part of the public domain through no fault of a Receiving Party; or
(d) information the Receiving Party receives from a Non-Party properly and rightfully in
possession of said information, and not as a result of any breach of confidentiality, and properly
and rightfully authorized to make disclosure without restriction as to disclosure. The Receiving
Party shall have the burden of proving that the use or disclosure satisfies one or more of these
criteria. Furthermore, Designating Parties will use reasonable care to avoid designating
Discovery Materials that do not need to or cannot be designated as such.
3.4.
The Receiving Party may challenge a designation of CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL and OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material in accordance
with the provisions of Paragraph 7.1.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 8 of 37
4.
DESIGNATING MATERIALS AS “CONFIDENTIAL”, “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” AND/OR “OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY”
4.1.
Designating Documentary Discovery Material. Any Party or any Non-Party may
designate Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE
COUNSEL EYES ONLY under the procedures and standards set forth in this Order, and such
Discovery Material shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.
4.2.
Manner and Timing of Designations. The designation of information as
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY for
purposes of this Order shall be made in the following manner:
a.
For information in documentary or digital image format the Designating
Party shall affix a legend to each page or digital image that contains Protected Material. The
legend shall include “CONFIDENTIAL”, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” or “OUTSIDE
COUNSEL EYES ONLY” adjacent to the Bates Numbers. The legend shall be affixed in such a
manner as not to obliterate or obscure any written part of the Discovery Material.
b.
For Discovery Material produced in some form other than documentary or
digital image, and for any other tangible items such as recordings, magnetic media, photographs
and things, the Designating Party shall affix in a prominent place a legend substantially in the
above form to the Discovery Material, or a container for it, or in the electronic file name, in any
suitable and readily viewable manner.
c.
A Party or Non-Party that makes hard-copy documents or other Discovery
Materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the
inspecting Party has indicated which documents or other Discovery Materials it would like
copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, and until and unless
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 9 of 37
produced without any confidentiality designation, all Discovery Materials made available for
inspection shall be deemed to be OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY. After the inspecting
Party has identified the documents or other Discovery Material it wants copied and produced, the
Producing Party shall affix the appropriate legend on each page or other container, as
appropriate, that contains Protected Material.
d.
To the extent that any party or counsel for any party creates, develops or
otherwise establishes on any digital or analog machine-readable device, recording media,
computer,
disc,
network,
tape,
file,
database
or
program
information
designated
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY that party
and/or its counsel must take all necessary steps to ensure that access to such media is properly
restricted to those persons who, by the terms of this Order, may have access to CONFIDENTIAL,
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY Information, and will affix to
any media containing such information a label with the legend provided for in Paragraph 4.2(a)
above.
e.
In the case of interrogatory answers and responses to requests for
admissions, if appropriate, the following legend shall be placed on each page of interrogatory
answers or responses to requests for admission containing Protected Material: “CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION”, “CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION” or “CONTAINS OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY INFORMATION”.
f.
For testimony given in a deposition, or other pretrial proceeding:
(i)
Parties and deponents may, within 60 days after receiving a final
transcript of a deposition, designate the transcript (and exhibits thereto) as CONFIDENTIAL,
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY to the extent the Party
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 10 of 37
or deponent believes the transcript contains Protected Material. Such arguably
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
Information within the deposition transcript may be designated by providing to all Parties and to
the court reporter a copy of the transcript with the parts designated as CONFIDENTIAL,
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY highlighted in yellow.
(ii)
Until the expiration of the 60-day period during which such
designations may be made, the entire deposition will be treated as subject to protection as
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL under this Order, except for parts of the deposition transcript that
discuss Discovery Material that has been previously designated, or are designated on the record
during the deposition, as OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY. If a designation is made, the
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
portions and exhibits, if filed with the Court, shall be subject to the filing requirements set forth
in Paragraph 9.1 below.
(iii)
If any depositions are videotaped or digitally recorded, those
portions of the videotape or recording corresponding to portions of the deposition transcript
designated as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL
EYES ONLY shall be afforded the same status.
(iv)
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any testimony quoting from or
otherwise referencing Discovery Material reproduced in these Actions by a Non-Party that was
previously produced in In Re: Epipen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices
and Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:17-md-02785 (D. Kan.) (the “EpiPen MDL”)—including
documents produced in Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Mylan, Inc. et al., No. 2:17-cv-02763-MCALDW (D.N.J.) (the “Sanofi Action”)—and designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL may be
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 11 of 37
disclosed only to those persons described in Paragraphs 5.3 (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (j), (l), and
5.4 (a) and (b).
4.3.
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. The inadvertent failure to designate particular
Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE
COUNSEL EYES ONLY at the time of production shall not operate to waive a Party’s or
person’s right to later designate such Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY. Any correction and notice of
the correction shall be made in writing, accompanied by substitute copies of each item of
Discovery Material, properly marked CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or
OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY in accordance with Paragraph 4.2 of this Order. A
Receiving Party may challenge the correction and the fact of a late designation in accordance
with Paragraph 7.1 of this Order, and until that challenge is resolved by the Parties or the Court,
the disputed Discovery Material shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY in accordance with the corrected
designation. If no challenge is made, then within 5 calendar days of receipt of substitute copies
of the Discovery Material, the Receiving Party shall destroy or return to counsel for the
Producing Party all copies of such misdesignated Discovery Material. No Party shall be deemed
to have violated this Order if, prior to notification of any later designation, such Discovery
Material has been disclosed or used in a manner inconsistent with the later designation. If the
Discovery Material that was inadvertently not designated is, by the time of the later designation,
filed with a court on the public record, the Party or Non-Party that failed to make the designation
shall move for appropriate relief.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 12 of 37
4.4.
Increasing the Designation of Discovery Material Produced by Other Parties or
Non-Parties. Subject to the standards of Paragraphs 1.5 and 1.6, a Party may increase the
designation (i.e., change any Discovery Material produced without a designation to a designation
of “CONFIDENTIAL”, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” or “OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES
ONLY”, change any Discovery Material produced as “CONFIDENTIAL” to a designation of
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” or “OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” or change any
Discovery Material produced as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to a designation of “OUTSIDE
COUNSEL EYES ONLY”) of any Discovery Material produced by any other Party or NonParty, provided that said Discovery Material contains the Designating Party’s own
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
Information.
a.
Increasing a designation shall be accomplished by providing written notice
to all Parties, and the Producing Party if the Producing Party is a Non-Party, identifying (by
Bates Number or other individually identifiable information) the Discovery Material whose
designation is to be increased. Promptly after providing such notice, the Designating Party shall
provide relabeled copies of the Discovery Material to each Receiving Party reflecting the change
in designation. The Receiving Party will replace the incorrectly designated material with the
newly designated materials and will destroy the incorrectly designated materials. Any Party may
object to the increased designation of Discovery Material pursuant to the procedures set forth in
Paragraph 7.1 regarding challenging designations. If a challenge is made, the Designating Party
shall bear the burden of establishing the basis for the increased designation, and until the
challenge is resolved by the Parties or the Court, the disputed Discovery Material shall be treated
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 13 of 37
as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and/or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
in accordance with the corrected designation.
b.
No Party shall be held in breach of this Order if, prior to notification of
such later re-designation, the Protected Material was disclosed or used in a manner inconsistent
with such later re-designation.
4.5.
Timing of Designation. Unless otherwise specified in Paragraph 4.4, any such
Protected Material designation shall be made in good faith by the Designating Party and made at
the time of disclosure, production or tender.
5.
DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL
5.1.
Absent an agreement of the Producing Party or an Order to the contrary by this
Court or other court of competent jurisdiction, and except as provided in Paragraph 5.5 below,
each Party and all other persons bound by the terms of this Order shall use any Discovery
Material produced or otherwise provided by a Party or Non-Party other than itself solely for
purposes of litigating or attempting to settle any part of the Actions. In no event shall such
Discovery Materials be used for any business, competitive, personal, private, public purpose or
for any purpose or proceeding other than as stated in this Paragraph. The attorneys of record for
the Parties shall exercise reasonable care to ensure that the information and documents governed
by this Order are (a) used only for the purpose specified herein and (b) disclosed only to
authorized persons.
5.2.
Discovery Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a
location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized
under this Order. For purposes of this Order, a secure website, or other internet-based document
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 14 of 37
depository with adequate security and access limited to persons authorized under this Order,
shall be deemed a secure location.
5.3.
CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material may be disclosed, summarized, described,
revealed or otherwise made available in whole or in part only in accordance with the terms of
this Order and only to the following persons:
a.
any officer, director or employee of a Party who is required in good faith
to provide material assistance in the conduct of the Actions;
b.
Parties’ In House Counsel;
c.
Outside Counsel for the Parties;
d.
this Court, or any other court exercising jurisdiction with respect to the
Actions, any appellate court(s), court personnel and qualified persons (including necessary
clerical personnel) recording, taking or transcribing testimony or argument at any deposition,
hearing, trial or appeal in the Actions;
e.
any person designated by the Court upon such terms as the Court may
f.
any special master, mediator or arbitrator engaged by the Parties or
deem proper;
authorized by the Court for purposes of mediation, arbitration or other dispute resolution
regarding issues arising in the Actions;
g.
Experts and Consultants retained by the Parties to provide services in the
Actions. This Paragraph shall not relieve, change or otherwise affect any obligations or
limitations imposed on any person by contract or law regarding the disclosure or use of trade
secrets or other confidential or proprietary information;
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 15 of 37
h.
Professional Vendors retained by the Parties to provide services in the
i.
a fact witness, at the witness’s deposition in the Actions, but only if
Actions;
counsel who discloses Protected Material to the witness determines, in good faith, that such
disclosure is reasonably necessary and appropriate to assist in the conduct of the Actions, and
subject to the terms set forth in this Order regarding the use of Protected Material in depositions;
j.
the author, addressees or recipients of the document, or any current
employee or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) witness of the Producing or Designating
Party;
k.
(i) the person, or a current officer, director or employee of an entity that
produced or originally created the Protected Material; (ii) any person who was an officer or
employee of the Producing Party at the time the Protected Material was originally created,
provided that the disclosing party has a good faith belief that the matters memorialized in the
Protected Material were within the scope of employment of, or otherwise were known to, such
person; (iii) any person who was an author, addressee or recipient of the Protected Material
sought to be disclosed to that person; or (iv) any person expressly mentioned, discussed or
referred to by actual name in the Protected Material as indicated on its face, provided that the
disclosing party has a good faith belief that the matters memorialized in the Protected Material
were within the scope of employment of, or otherwise were known to, such person; and
l.
others as to whom the Designating Party has agreed (or in the case of
CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material for which there are multiple Designating Parties, all
Designating Parties have agreed) in writing or on the record.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 16 of 37
5.4.
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material may be disclosed only to those
persons described in Paragraphs 5.3 (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k) and (l). The Receiving
Party also may designate no more than two individuals who meet the description provided in
Paragraph 5.3(a) and may disclose HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material or
information contained therein to those individuals provided that: (1) the Receiving Party
provides advance notice to the Producing Party of the identities of the designated individuals; (2)
the designated individuals are actively assisting in the Actions; and (3) the designated individuals
agree not to disclose at any time the HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material or
information contained therein to any officer, director, employee or person affiliated with a Party,
unless that person is otherwise permitted to possess such HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Discovery
Material under the terms of this Order. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material or
information contained therein also may be disclosed to those persons described in Paragraph
5.3(b), provided that they are actively assisting in the Actions, and agree not to disclose at any
time the HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material or information contained therein to any
officer, director, employee or person affiliated with a Party, unless that person is otherwise
permitted to possess such HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material under the terms of
this Order. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Discovery Material reproduced in these Actions by a
Non-Party that was previously produced in the EpiPen MDL—including documents produced in
the Sanofi Action—and designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL may be disclosed only to those
persons described in Paragraphs 5.3 (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (j), (l), and
a.
the following designated in-house counsel, provided that they execute a
declaration in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B:
(i)
Mylan: Brian Cuthbertson, Bradley Matta
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 17 of 37
(ii)
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority: Jack Hippisley Baumer,
Patrick De Carbuccia
(iii)
Class Representatives: (Class Representatives reserve the
right to designate two, and only two, members of in-house
counsel for the purposes this section by giving notice of the
two names to all Parties and to plaintiffs in the Sanofi
Action and upon their executing a declaration in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit B.)
(iv)
MYL Litigation Recovery Vehicle I LLC: Andrew
Weinfeld, Daniel Roitman
b.
a fact witness, at the witness’s deposition in the Actions, who appears on
the face of the document, or is shown through testimony or other evidentiary proof by the party
wishing to make the disclosure, to have prepared, received, or reviewed the information.
5.5.
OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material may be disclosed only
to those persons described in Paragraphs 5.3 (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k) and (l). Unless
otherwise agreed to by the Parties, OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material also
may be disclosed to those persons described in Paragraph 5.3(b) under limited circumstances
where (a) the Designating Party has agreed in writing or on the record to the disclosure; (b) the
Receiving Party believes in good faith that there is a compelling need for those persons to review
the particular OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material; and (c) those persons are
actively assisting in the Actions, and agree not to disclose at any time the OUTSIDE COUNSEL
EYES ONLY Discovery Material or information contained therein to any officer, director,
employee or person affiliated with a Party, unless that person is otherwise permitted to possess
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 18 of 37
such OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material under the terms of this Order. If
the Designating Party does not agree in writing or on the record to the disclosure, Counsel for the
Receiving Party shall apply for authorization under Paragraph 15.4 of the Protective Order, and
on any such application, the Designating Party shall have the burden of showing that: (i) the
Discovery Material satisfies the criteria for designation as OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY;
and (ii) consent to the disclosure sought was appropriately withheld.
5.6.
To the extent that OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material is
disclosed under Paragraph 5.5 to any natural person who is a former employee of the Producing
or Designating Party, it may only be done provided that the former employee at the time of the
disclosure is not employed by, an agent of or otherwise affiliated with a competitor, supplier or
customer of the Producing or Designating Party, unless such former employee is authorized to
receive the OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material under Paragraph 5.3(j).
5.7.
This Order shall not restrict any attorney who is a qualified recipient under the
terms of Paragraphs 5.3(b) or 5.3(c), 5.4 and 5.5 from rendering advice to his or her client that is
a Party with respect to this Actions, and in the course thereof, from generally relying upon his or
her examination of Protected Material. In rendering such advice or in otherwise communicating
with the client, the attorney shall not disclose directly or indirectly the specific content of any
Protected Material of another Party or Non-Party where such disclosure would not otherwise be
permitted under the terms of this Order.
5.8.
This Order shall not apply to and, thus, does not restrict any Party’s use, for any
purpose, of: (a) its own Protected Material or (b) any documents, things, information or other
material that: (i) at the time of disclosure in the Actions is publicly known through no
unauthorized act of such Party; (ii) was lawfully developed or obtained independent of discovery
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 19 of 37
in the Actions or (iii) was obtained or purchased by a Party from a Non-Party under a
confidentiality or other non-disclosure agreement. The Party shall have the burden of proving
that the use or disclosure satisfies one or more of these criteria. Any Party with material covered
by provision 5.8(b)(ii) or (iii) may, at its election, designate all or any part of the material that
otherwise meets the provision of Paragraph 1.4, 1.5 or 1.6 as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY for all purposes under this Order, and
if so designated, the material shall be deemed Protected Material under this Order. For the
avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Paragraph shall be construed to permit a Receiving Party to
disclose Discovery Material that has been designated by another Party as CONFIDENTIAL,
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY except in accordance with
Paragraphs 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5 of this Order.
6.
PROCEDURES FOR DISCLOSURE OF “CONFIDENTIAL”, “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” AND “OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” INFORMATION
6.1.
Every person to whom Protected Material or information contained therein is to
be disclosed, summarized, described, characterized, or otherwise communicated or made
available in whole or in part, first shall be advised that the Protected Material or information is
being disclosed pursuant and subject to the terms of this Order.
6.2.
Before disclosure of any Protected Material is made under Paragraphs 5.3, 5.4 and
5.5, the person to whom disclosure is to be made shall execute a copy of the Acknowledgement
and Agreement to be Bound by Stipulated Protective Order (“Agreement”) attached hereto as
Exhibit A; provided that: (a) persons in Paragraphs 5.3(c), (d) and (e) shall not be required to
execute Exhibit A and (b) a witness at a deposition may state on the record under oath that he or
she agrees to be bound by this Order to the same extent as provided for in Exhibit A.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 20 of 37
6.3.
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
Protected Material to any person not authorized under this Order, the Receiving Party must
immediately (a) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies or obtain a certification of destruction of
the Protected Material, (b) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were
made of all the terms of this Order, (c) request such person or persons to execute the Agreement
attached as Exhibit A and (d) inform each Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosure.
7.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
7.1.
Application to strike designation: Any Party challenging another Party’s or
person’s designation of Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or
OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY (the “Challenging Party”) may make, in the manner
prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules, a motion or other
appropriate application to the Court to strike the designation at any time. The Challenging Party
shall provide written notice to the Designating Party, identifying the CONFIDENTIAL,
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material whose
designation it challenges and setting forth the basis for the challenge. Within 21 business days of
its receipt of written notice of the challenge to its designation, the Designating Party shall meet
and confer with the Challenging Party and these parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve
any dispute concerning the designation by agreement or stipulation. Failing such agreement or
stipulation, the Challenging Party’s motion or application regarding the challenged material shall
be filed under seal and shall identify with specificity the CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material that is the subject
of the motion. If such a motion or application is made, the Designating Party may respond, and
all Discovery Material so designated shall maintain its as-designated CONFIDENTIAL,
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 21 of 37
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY status pending a
determination by the Court as to its appropriate status. The Designating Party bears the burden
to justify the designation challenged.
7.2.
Nothing in this Paragraph 7 shall limit the right of any Party to petition the Court
for an in camera review of any Discovery Material.
8.
EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES
8.1.
The use of Protected Material at any deposition is subject to the limitations on
disclosure provided in Paragraphs 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5.
8.2.
If a deposition witness is examined concerning Protected Material, the
Designating Party shall have the right to exclude from the portion of the examination concerning
such information any person not authorized in accordance with Paragraphs 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5 above
to have access to such material.
9.
FILING CONFIDENTIAL DISCOVERY MATERIAL
9.1.
If either party desires to file anything with the Court that previously has been
designated as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES
ONLY, that party must move to file under seal, unless the Designating Party provides written
consent in advance that filing the Protected Material under seal is unnecessary. Any such motion
to file under seal shall be made in accordance with the rules of this Court. If the motion is granted,
and to the extent not inconsistent with the rules of this Court, such documents and materials shall
be appropriately labeled and shall also bear the legend “FILED UNDER SEAL” on the cover page
of the document. Only those portions of such documents and materials containing or reflecting
Protected Material shall be considered CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or
OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY for the purposes of this Order. Regardless of any provision
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 22 of 37
in this Order to the contrary, a party is not required to file a document under seal if the Protected
Material contained or reflected in the document was so designated solely by that party.
10.
PROTECTED MATERIAL OFFERED AT TRIAL
10.1.
The use of Protected Material for the purpose of any hearing or proceeding that is
open to the public will be the subject of future agreement or order as the need may arise.
10.2.
No fewer than 30 days before the date upon which the Parties are directed to
submit a Joint Pretrial Order in the Actions, the Parties shall meet and confer to negotiate a
proposal for Court approval addressing the treatment of material previously designated
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY at trial.
To the extent the Parties fail to agree on a proposal addressing the use of such Protected Material
at trial, they may submit alternative proposals to the Court for resolution.
11.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
11.1.
If Protected Material is disclosed to anyone other than in a manner authorized by
this Stipulated Protective Order, the party responsible for such disclosure must immediately bring
all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure to the attention of the other party, and make every
reasonable effort to retrieve such Protected Material and to prevent further disclosure.
11.2.
Inadvertent or Unintentional Disclosure of Protected Material. An inadvertent
failure to designate Protected Material does not constitute a waiver of the Designating Party’s
right to secure protection under this Stipulated Protective Order for such material. A
Designating Party that inadvertently fails to designate Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL,
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY, or that misdesignates
Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL
EYES ONLY pursuant to this Order at the time of its production shall be entitled to make a
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 23 of 37
correction to its designation within a reasonable time of the discovery of the non- or
misdesignation. Such correction and notice thereof shall be made in writing, accompanied by
substitute copies of each item of Discovery Material, appropriately designated. Those
individuals who received the Discovery Material prior to notice of non- or misdesignation by the
Designating Party shall within five (5) days of receipt of the substitute copies, take reasonable
steps to either (a) sequester the document if the new designation is disputed; or (b) destroy or
return to the law firm representing the Designating Party all copies of such misdesignated
documents. The obligation to treat such material pursuant to the corrected designation shall be
prospective only, and those individuals who reviewed the misdesignated Discovery Material
prior to notice of the misdesignation by the Designating Party shall abide by the provisions of
this Order with respect to all future use and disclosure of any information contained in the
misdesignated materials.
12.
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED MATERIAL
12.1.
If, in connection with the Actions, information subject to a claim of attorney-
client privilege, the common interest privilege, work product protection or other legally
cognizable privilege or immunity is inadvertently disclosed (“Disclosed Privileged
Information”), the disclosure of the Disclosed Privileged Information shall not constitute or be
deemed a waiver or forfeiture of any claim of privilege or other protection that a Producing Party
would otherwise be entitled to assert with respect to the Disclosed Privileged Information and its
subject matter. The Parties intend that this provision shall displace the provisions of Fed. R.
Evid. 502(b)(l) and (2), and that this provision shall constitute an Order under Fed R. Evid.
502(d).
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 24 of 37
12.2.
If a Producing Party becomes aware that it has inadvertently produced Disclosed
Privileged Information, the Producing Party will promptly notify each Receiving Party in writing
of the inadvertent production. Within 10 business days of receipt of such notice, each Receiving
Party to which such notice is directed: (a) must return, sequester or destroy the Disclosed
Privileged Information and any copies; (b) must not use or disclose the Disclosed Privileged
Information until the claim is resolved; (c) must take reasonable steps to recall the Disclosed
Privileged Information if the Receiving Party disclosed it before being notified; and (d) must
provide a written certification of counsel that all such Disclosed Privileged Information has been
returned, sequestered or destroyed. Any notes or summaries referring or relating to any such
Disclosed Privileged Information shall be destroyed or sequestered within the 10 business day
period provided for.
12.3.
If a Receiving Party receives materials that reasonably appear to be subject to an
attorney-client privilege, the common interest privilege, work product protection or otherwise
protected by a discovery privilege or immunity, the Receiving Party must refrain from further
examination of the materials that may be privileged or protected, and shall immediately notify
the Producing Party, in writing, that the Receiving Party possesses such material.
12.4.
Nothing herein shall prevent the Receiving Party from challenging the propriety
of the attorney-client privilege or work product immunity or other applicable privilege
designation by submitting a challenge to the Court. If the underlying claim of privilege or
protection is contested, the Parties shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(B) and the
Receiving Party may promptly seek a judicial determination of the matter pursuant to that rule (a
“Privilege Motion”). Any Privilege Motion shall not assert as a ground for granting the motion
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 25 of 37
the fact or circumstance of the production in the Actions of the Discovery Material claimed to be
privileged.
12.5.
The Producing Party asserting privilege retains the burden of establishing the
privileged or protected nature of any Disclosed Privileged Information. Nothing in Paragraphs
12.1 through 12.4 shall limit the right of any Party to petition the Court for an in camera review
of the Disclosed Privileged Information.
13.
OTHER PROCEEDINGS
If, at any time, any CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE
COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material in the possession, custody or control of any Party
or person other than the Designating Party is subpoenaed or requested by any court,
administrative agency, legislative body or other person or entity, before producing any
CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
Discovery Materials, the Party or person to whom the subpoena or request is directed shall
provide prompt written notice to the original Designating Party. Should the Designating Party
oppose the request for production of such documents or materials, the Party or person to whom
the subpoena or request is directed shall not take any position concerning the propriety of such
request or subpoena or the discoverability of the information sought that is adverse to the
Designating Party unless otherwise ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. Other than the
obligation to comply with these requirements, this Order is not intended to affect a Party’s
obligation to respond to such a subpoena or request.
14.
CONCLUSION OF THE LITIGATION
14.1.
The provisions of this Order shall continue to be binding after final termination of
the Actions. Within 60 days after final conclusion of all aspects of the Actions, including any
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 26 of 37
appeals, any Party and all persons who received (or tendered to any other person) Discovery
Material designated for CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE
COUNSEL EYES ONLY treatment (or any copy thereof) must, at the election of the Receiving
Party, either: (a) return such Protected Material to the Producing Party or (b) certify in writing to
counsel for the Producing Party that the Receiving Party or such person(s) to whom Protected
Material had been tendered has destroyed those documents and materials and the portions of all
other material containing or reflecting Protected Material.
14.2.
The costs of return of Discovery Material to the Producing Party shall be borne by
the Receiving Party. The costs of destruction of the documents and materials shall be borne by
the Receiving Party. The costs associated with providing the aforementioned certification shall
be borne by the certifying person(s).
14.3.
Counsel for the Parties shall be permitted to retain copies of court filings, papers
served in connection with the Actions, transcripts (including deposition transcripts), exhibits,
correspondence and work product containing or reflecting CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY Discovery Material. The Receiving
Party’s reasonable efforts shall not require the return or destruction of materials that (i) are stored
on backup storage media made in accordance with regular data backup procedures for disaster
recovery purposes; (ii) are subject to litigation hold obligations; or (iii) are otherwise required by
law to be retained. Backup storage media need not be restored for purpose of returning or
certifying destruction of materials, but any such materials retained in backup storage media shall
continue to be treated in accordance with this Order.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 27 of 37
15.
OTHER
Non-waiver: Entering into, agreeing to and/or producing or receiving Protected Material
or otherwise complying with the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order shall not:
a.
Operate as an admission by any Party that any Protected Material contains
or reflects trade secrets or any other type of confidential or proprietary information entitled to
protection under applicable law;
b.
Prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the production of
documents it considers not subject to discovery, or operate as an admission by any party that the
restrictions and procedures set forth herein constitute adequate protection for any particular
information deemed by any party to be Protected Material;
c.
Prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the use, authenticity
or admissibility into evidence of any document, testimony or the evidence subject to this Stipulated
Protective Order;
d.
Prejudice in any way the rights of any party to seek a determination by the
Court whether any Discovery Material or Protected Material should be subject to the terms of this
Stipulated Protective Order;
e.
Prejudice in any way the rights of any party to petition the Court for a further
protective order relating to any purportedly Protected Material; or
f.
Prevent any party from agreeing to alter or waive the provisions or
protections provided for herein with respect to any particular Discovery Material.
15.2.
Additional Parties: The terms of this Order shall be binding upon all current and
future Parties to the Actions, and to any other cases that may be established by the Court as part
of the Actions in the future, and their counsel. Following entry of this Order: within 10 days of
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 28 of 37
the entry of an appearance by a new defendant or third-party defendant in the Actions, counsel
for defendants shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for any new defendant or third-party
defendant.
15.3.
Protection for Discovery Material Produced by Non-Parties: Any Non-Party
producing Discovery Material or giving deposition testimony in the Actions shall adhere to this
Order, unless they object, in writing to counsel for a Party and/or to the Court, to its terms within
10 days of service upon them of this Order. All counsel in the Actions shall have the obligation
to inform any Non-Party who produces Discovery Material or gives deposition testimony in the
Actions of the existence of this Order and, if requested, to provide a copy of this Order to such
person.
15.4.
Modification: Stipulations may be made, between counsel for the respective
Parties, as to the application of this Order to specific situations, provided that such stipulations
are recorded in writing or contained in the record of any oral proceeding. Nothing contained
herein shall preclude any Party from seeking an Order of the Court modifying or supplementing
this Order.
15.5.
Duration: Even after the termination of the Actions, the confidentiality
obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees
otherwise in writing or a Court Order otherwise directs.
15.6.
Jurisdiction: Any disputes relating to or arising under the terms of this agreement
shall be brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 29 of 37
Dated: September 9, 2020
POMERANTZ LLP
by /s/ Austin P. Van ____________
Jeremy A. Lieberman
Austin P. Van
600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Tel: (212) 661-1100
jalieberman@pomlaw.com
avan@pomlaw.com
Class Counsel
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
by /s/ Rory A. Leraris _____
David R. Marriott
Kevin J. Orsini
Rory A. Leraris
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Tel: (212) 474-1000
dmarriott@cravath.com
korsini@cravath.com
rleraris@cravath.com
Counsel for Defendants
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD
LLP
by
/s/ Luke O. Brooks __________
Luke O. Brooks
Angel P. Lau
Erika Oliver
Ting H. Liu
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 231-1058
lukeb@rgrdlaw.com
alau@rgrdlaw.com
eoliver@rgrdlaw.com
tliu@rgrdlaw.com
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD
LLP
Samuel H. Rudman
58 South Service Road, Suite 200
Melville, NY 11747
Telephone: (631) 367-7100
srudman@rgrdlaw.com
Counsel for Abu Dhabi Investment
Authority
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
by /s/ Jennifer A. Randolph _______
Lawrence M. Rolnick
Marc B. Kramer
Michael J. Hampson
Jennifer A. Randolph
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (212) 262-6700
lrolnick@lowenstein.com
mkramer@lowenstein.com
mhampson@lowenstein.com
jrandolph@lowenstein.com
Counsel for MYL Litigation Recovery
I LLC
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 30 of 37
SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 10, 2020
New York, New York
J. PAUL OETKEN
United States District Judge
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 31 of 37
EXHIBIT A
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 32 of 37
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
In re Mylan N.V. Securities Litigation
Case No. 1:16-CV-07926 (JPO)
MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC.
Case No. 1:19-CV-01799 (JPO)
vs.
Mylan N.V., et al.
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority
Case No. 1:20-cv-01342 (JPO)
vs.
Mylan N.V., et al.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT
TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER
I, __________________________ [print or type full name], ________________ [print
position of employment, firm name and full address], _________________ declare under penalty
of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Protective Order issued by the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on _________________
(ECF No. ____) in the actions In re Mylan N.V. Securities Litigation, No. 1:16-CV-07926 (JPO);
MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC v. Mylan N.V., et al., No.1:19-CV-01799 (JPO) and Abu Dhabi
Investment Authority v. Mylan N.V., No. 1:20-CV-01342 (JPO) (the “Order”).
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 33 of 37
I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of the Order. I understand that
Discovery Material designated as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or OUTSIDE
COUNSEL EYES ONLY under the Order is being provided to me pursuant to the terms of the
Order. I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and
punishment in the nature of contempt. I promise that I will not disclose in any manner any
information or item that is subject to the Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance
with the provisions of the Order.
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Order, even if such
enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this Action.
Dated: ___________________________________
City and State (or Country) where sworn and signed: ____________________________
Printed name: _________________________________
Signature: ____________________________________
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 34 of 37
EXHIBIT B
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 35 of 37
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
In re Mylan N.V. Securities Litigation
Case No. 1:16-CV-07926 (JPO)
MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC.
Case No. 1:19-CV-01799 (JPO)
vs.
Mylan N.V., et al.
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority
Case No. 1:20-cv-01342 (JPO)
vs.
Mylan N.V., et al.
IN-HOUSE COUNSEL DECLARATION OF [NAME]
I, _______________________, declare and state the following:
1.
I am over the age of 18, have personal knowledge of the facts at issue, and am competent
to testify to the matters set forth herein.
2.
I am
[TITLE]
, at
[COMPANY]
3.
I am one of the in-house counsel designated by
.
[COMPANY]
to access
Discovery Material reproduced in the above-captioned actions (the “Actions”) by a NonParty that was previously produced in In Re: Epipen (Epinephrine Injection, USP)
Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:17-md-02785 (D. Kan.) (the
“EpiPen MDL”)—including documents produced in Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Mylan,
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 36 of 37
Inc. et al., No. 2:17-cv-02763-MCA-LDW (D.N.J.) (the “Sanofi Action”)—and
designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL, as described by Paragraph 5.4 of the Stipulated
Protective Order in effect in the Actions (“the Order”).
4.
I certify that I have been provided with a copy of the Order, have read it, understand it,
and will abide by all of its terms.
5.
I certify that I am not involved in competitive decision-making at [COMPANY]
, which includes but is not limited to: advising or participating in pricing, product
design, marketing, strategic planning, or other decisions made in light of similar or
corresponding information about a competitor. My responsibilities with respect to
advising
[COMPANY]
on any of the above issues is limited to legal and
regulatory compliance.
6.
I certify that I do not manage, direct, or have day to day responsibility for patent
prosecution or litigation, including settlement of litigation, involving claims of patent
infringement (which, for purposes of clarity, does not include litigation, including, but
not limited to, antitrust, Administrative Procedure Act, or breach of contract litigation, in
which the only patent issues are incidental to or predicates of a non-patent claim or
defense), on behalf of [COMPANY]
7.
.
I certify that I will not share or provide access to any Discovery Material reproduced in
the Actions by a Non-Party that was previously produced in the EpiPen MDL—including
documents produced in the Sanofi Action—and designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,
as described by Paragraph 5.4 of the Order or the substance thereof to any current or
former employee of
[COMPANY]
involved in competitive decision-
making and/or patent prosecution or patent litigation.
Case 1:16-cv-07926-JPO Document 165 Filed 09/10/20 Page 37 of 37
8.
I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of enforcement of the Order.
I understand that violation of the Order or the matters to which I have certified herein
may be punishable by contempt of court.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
__________________, 202__.
[NAME]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?