Castro v. City of New York et al
Filing 89
ORDER: Plaintiff's date to file a response or letter is hereby extended to January 31, 2020. If Plaintiff informs the Court that he intends to pursue this action but chooses not to oppose Defendants' motion, then the Court will deem the mot ion fully briefed and take it under submission. See Jackson v. Fed. Exp., 766 F.3d 189, 194 (2d Cir. 2014). If, however, Plaintiff does not respond to this Order, either by responding to the motion for summary judgment or by submitting a letter indic ating that he does not intend to do so, then the Court will dismiss this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED., ( Responses due by 1/31/2020) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/02/2020) (ama) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
