Disabled in Action v. City Of New York et al.
Filing
168
ORDER granting 167 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application Granted. The July 7, 2020 Defendants-only conference is hereby adjourned to July 9, 2020 at 2:00 pm. Chambers will email instructions for the call. The Clerk of Court is directed to close ECF 167. SO ORDERED. (Telephone Conference set for 7/9/2020 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/6/2020) (rro)
THE CITY OF NEW YORK
LAW DEPARTMENT
JAMES E. JOHNSON
Corporation Counsel
CAROLYN E. KRUK
cell: (646) 939-7631
ckruk@law.nyc.gov
100 CHURCH STREET
NEW YORK, NY 10007
July 6, 2020
VIA ECF
Hon. Ona. T. Wang
United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Re:
MEMO ENDORSED
Disabled in Action et al. v. City of New York et al.
16 CV 8354 (VEC)(OTW)
Dear Magistrate Judge Wang:
I am one of the Assistant Corporation Counsels assigned to represent Defendants
in the above action. I write to respectfully request an adjournment of the settlement conference
currently scheduled for Defendants’ counsel alone, tomorrow, July 7, 2020, at 11:30 a.m., as Mr.
Kitzinger and I have a conflict in another case, and our colleague, Mr. Toews, is out of the office
this week. Mr. Kitzinger and I are available to speak with Your Honor this Wednesday
afternoon, or anytime on Thursday, or another later date that is convenient to the court. I
apologize for the lateness of this request and thank Your Honor for your consideration.
Respectfully,
/s
Carolyn Kruk
cc. Plaintiffs’ counsel (by ECF)
Application Granted. The July 7, 2020 Defendants-only
conference is hereby adjourned to July 9, 2020 at 2:00 pm.
Chambers will email instructions for the call. The Clerk of Court
is directed to close ECF 167. SO ORDERED.
_______________
Ona T. Wang July 6, 2020
U.S.M.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?