Disabled in Action v. City Of New York et al.
Filing
190
ORDER granting 189 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 8/12/2021) (kv)
Case 1:16-cv-08354-VEC Document 190 Filed 08/12/21 Page 1 of 1
MEMO ENDORSED
Application GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
______________________
THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Ona T. Wang 8/12/21
U.S.M.J.
LAW DEPARTMENT
GEORGIA M. PESTANA
Corporation Counsel
CAROLYN E. KRUK
Office: (212) 356-0893
Cell: (646) 939-7631
ckruk@law.nyc.gov
100 CHURCH STREET
NEW YORK, NY 10007
August 11, 2021
By ECF
Hon. Ona. T. Wang
United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Re:
Disabled in Action et al. v. City of New York et al.
16 CV 8354 (VEC)(OTW)
Dear Magistrate Judge Wang:
I am one of the Assistant Corporation Counsels assigned to represent Defendants
in the above action. I write to respectfully request an extension of time for the parties to submit
their ex parte letters to the Court, from August 13 to August 18, 2021, in advance of the
settlement conference scheduled before Your Honor on August 23, 2021 at 3 p.m.
Yesterday afternoon, on behalf of Defendants, I verbally communicated a new
settlement proposal to Plaintiffs’ counsel, Darin McAtee. Today, I intend to provide Plaintiffs’
counsel with a written summary of it. To give Plaintiffs time to review and consider Defendants’
proposal, and communicate their response to Defendants – and perhaps follow up with any
questions or concerns, Defendants respectfully request a brief extension to August 18, 2021, for
the parties to provide the Court with their ex parte letters in advance of the settlement conference
scheduled for August 23, 2021 at 3 p.m.
This is Defendants’ first request for an extension of this deadline. Plaintiffs
consent to the request.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
/s
Carolyn Kruk
cc. Plaintiffs’ counsel (by ECF)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?