H. Daya International Co., Ltd. v. DO Denim, LLC et al

Filing 204

ORDER granting 189 Letter Motion to Seal; granting 196 Letter Motion to Seal. Having reviewed the sealed exhibits, the Court will GRANT the request to seal Exhibit I (Dkt. No. 194-9). However, the Court is not persuaded that wholesale sealing of Exhibits L (Dkt. No. 188-13) and E (Dkt. No. 194-5) is necessary or that these documents could not be redacted to remove any identifying or sensitive personal information. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Letter Motions (Dkt. Nos. 189, 19 6) are GRANTED in part. While Exhibit I of the declaration of Salomon Murciano (Dkt. No. 194-9) may be fully sealed, the defendants must file a redacted version of Exhibit E of the Murciano Declaration (Dkt. No. 194-5) and Exhibit L of the declaration of Galina Sosonko (Dkt. No. 189), however. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 6/21/2021) (rro)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------X
H. DAYA INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
16 Civ. 8668 (VM)
:
- against :
ORDER
:
DO DENIM, LLC, et al.
:
:
Defendants.
:
-----------------------------------X
VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.
Consistent with the Court’s Individual Practices, the
parties in the above-captioned matter filed letter motions
requesting authorization to file three exhibits under seal.
(See “Letter Motions,” Dkt. Nos. 189, 196.) In particular,
the parties seek to seal Exhibits E and I attached to the
declaration of Salomon Murciano (Dkt. Nos. 194-5, 194-9) and
Exhibit L attached to the declaration of Galina Sosonko (Dkt.
No. 188-13). Materials may remain under seal “if the sealing
order is narrowly tailored to achieve that aim.” Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006).
Having reviewed the sealed exhibits, the Court will
GRANT the request to seal Exhibit I (Dkt. No. 194-9). However,
the Court is not persuaded that wholesale sealing of Exhibits
L (Dkt. No. 188-13) and E (Dkt. No. 194-5) is necessary or
that these documents could not be redacted to remove any

1

identifying or sensitive personal information. Accordingly,
it is hereby
ORDERED that the Letter Motions (Dkt. Nos. 189, 196) are
GRANTED in part. While Exhibit I of the declaration of Salomon
Murciano (Dkt. No. 194-9) may be fully sealed, the defendants
must file a redacted version of Exhibit E of the Murciano
Declaration (Dkt. No. 194-5) and Exhibit L of the declaration
of Galina Sosonko (Dkt. No. 189), however.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

New York, New York
21 June 2021

2