U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Hartshorn

Filing 72

ORDER: Pursuant to the Status Report dated March 13, 2020, the parties have advised that the CFTC's Division of Enforcement and Mr. Hartshorn have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, the STAY in this case is hereby EXTENDED until Jun e 22, 2020. The Parties are hereby ORDERED to submit the proposed consent order, report back to the Court regarding the status of this case, or otherwise make further requests as appropriate, on or before June 22, 2020. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/17/2020) (jwh) (Main Document 72 replaced on 3/17/2020) (jwh).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 3/17/20 U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, No. 16-CV-9802 (ALC) v. BRETT G. HARTSHORN, Defendant. ORDER EXTENDING STAY Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated May 1, 2019, this case was stayed until June 24, 2019. Pursuant to the Court’s Orders dated June 17, 2019, July 22, 2019, August 20, 2019, September 20, 2019, and December 16, 2019 (ECF Nos. 56, 59, 62. 65, 66, 69), the stay was extended to July 24, 2019, August 26, 2019, September 26, 2019, December 20, 2019, and March 20, 2020, respectively. Pursuant to the Status Report dated March 13, 2020, the parties have advised that the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement and Mr. Hartshorn have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, the STAY in this case is hereby EXTENDED until June 22, 2020. The Parties are hereby ORDERED to submit the proposed consent order, report back to the Court regarding the status of this case, or otherwise make further requests as appropriate, on or before June 22, 2020. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2020 New York, New York ________________________________ ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?