Federal Trade Commission et al v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc. et al

Filing 291

ORDER with respect to 219 Letter Motion to Seal; with respect to 263 Letter Motion to Seal: After a personal review of the documents submitted in support of defendants' summary judgment motions, whose portions defendants seek to file under seal (Dkt. Nos. 263 and 219), which plaintiffs oppose (Dkt. Nos. 252 and 275), I find that only the Exhibits attached to Exhibit 5 to the de Leeuw Declaration (Exhibits A through F, analyzing sales) may remain under seal intheir entirety. The other Exhibits to the de Leeuw, Underwood and Graham Declarations do not warrant redaction or sealing under the standard set forth in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F. 3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 8/24/2022) (ml)

Case 1:17-cv-00124-LLS Document 291 Filed 08/24/22 Page 1 of 1
t;SDC SONY
DOCL''.\'IENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EL EC TRO\ IC..\LLY FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
DOC:: :
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ET AL .,
D .\ l E FI-L-E-D:_ 8_/r~ -._/7....,.'l-- -1--Plaintiffs ,
- against -

17 Civ . 0124

QUINCY BIOSCIENCE HOLDING CO .,
ET AL. ,

(LLS)

ORDER

INC .,

Defendants .

After a personal review of the documents submitted in
support of defendants '

summary judgment motions , whose portions

defendants seek to file under seal (Dkt. Nos. 263 and 219) , which
plaintiffs oppose (Dkt . Nos. 252 and 275) , I find that only the
Exhibits attached to Exhibit 5 to the de Leeuw Declaration
(Exhibits A through F , analyzing sales) may remain under seal in
their entirety . The other Exhibits to the de Leeuw , Underwood and
Graham Declarations do not warrant redaction or sealing under the
standard set forth in Lugosch v.

Pyramid Co . of Onondaga , 435

F . 3d 110 (2d Cir . 2006) .
So ordered .
Dated :

New York , New York
August 24 , 2022

LOUIS L . STANTON
U.S . D. J .

- 1-