Lopez et al v. City of New York et al

Filing 119

ORDER: The parties shall appear for oral argument on February 24, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. related to Defendants' ten pending motions in limine. Argument will focus primarily on the following motions: (As further set forth herein.) Finally, arg ument regarding the pending motions in limine will be held by teleconference. The Court will communicate separately to counsel information for joining the conference. Members of the public may join the teleconference using the following listen-only line: 877-402-9753, access code: 6545179. SO ORDERED. ( Telephone Conference set for 2/24/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Loretta A. Preska.) (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 2/10/2021) (va)

Case 1:17-cv-00181-LAP Document 119 Filed 02/10/21 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SUHAIL LAUREANO,
Plaintiff,

No. 17-CV-181 (LAP)

-against-

ORDER

CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
Defendants.
LORETTA A. PRESKA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
The parties shall appear for oral argument on February 24,
2021 at 11:00 a.m. related to Defendants’ ten pending motions in
limine.

Argument will focus primarily on the following motions:



First Motion in Limine: To preclude the testimony of
Plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. Elaine Chau. (See dkt. no. 81.)



Second Motion in Limine: To preclude Plaintiffs from
introducing any “damages related” evidence. (See dkt.
no. 82.)



Fourth Motion in Limine: To preclude Plaintiffs from
introducing videotaped footage from Eliezer Lopez’s
deposition. (See dkt. no. 84.)



Sixth Motion in Limine: To preclude testimony from
certain NYPD and emergency services personnel witnesses.
(See dkt. no. 86.)



Ninth Motion in Limine: To admit evidence that Mr. Lopez
lied at his deposition regarding certain offenses to
which he pleaded guilty. (See dkt. no. 89.)
Additionally, the parties shall confer and provide the

following information to the Court for in camera review:

1

Case 1:17-cv-00181-LAP Document 119 Filed 02/10/21 Page 2 of 2



Third Motion in Limine: The referenced photos taken by
the Internal Affairs Bureau (“IAB”), to the extent that
those photos have not already been shared with the Court.
If those photos have already been provided, Counsel will
identify which photos were taken by IAB and which were
taken by Ms. Laureano.



Fourth Motion in Limine:
footage.



Fifth Motion in Limine: An explanation, including
transcripts, regarding what testimony of Sergeant Rosario
Plaintiffs expect to conflict with Sergeant Rosario’s
statements to Officer Ryan.

The relevant video deposition

That information shall be provided via the chambers inbox
([e-mail]) no later than February
15, 2021.
Finally, argument regarding the pending motions in limine
will be held by teleconference.

The Court will communicate

separately to counsel information for joining the conference.
Members of the public may join the teleconference using the
following listen-only line: 877-402-9753, access code: 6545179.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 10, 2021
New York, New York
___________________________
LORETTA A. PRESKA, U.S.D.J.

2