Lopez et al v. City of New York et al

Filing 130

ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' letters regarding Dr. Chiu's proposed testimony. (See dkt. nos. 128-129.) The Court finds that--consistent with its order on the parties' motions in limine, (see dkt. no. 126)--Dr. Chiu may testify that Eliezer Lopez sustained burst fractures to his C4 and C5 cervical vertebrae (as well as the absence of injuries to other parts of his body). Dr. Chiu, may not, however, testify about (1) the severity of the fractures or (2) the consequences of those injuries (including any pain and suffering). Moreover, Plaintiff may not introduce medical records or photographs depicting the burst fractures. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/02/2021) (ama)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-00181-LAP Document 130 Filed 09/02/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SUHAIL LAUREANO, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Eliezer Lopez, No. 17-CV-181 (LAP) Plaintiff, ORDER -againstCITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties’ letters regarding Dr. Chiu’s proposed testimony. (See dkt. nos. 128-129.) The Court finds that--consistent with its order on the parties’ motions in limine, (see dkt. no. 126)--Dr. Chiu may testify that Eliezer Lopez sustained burst fractures to his C4 and C5 cervical vertebrae (as well as the absence of injuries to other parts of his body). Dr. Chiu, may not, however, testify about (1) the severity of the fractures or (2) the consequences of those injuries (including any pain and suffering). Moreover, Plaintiff may not introduce medical records or photographs depicting the burst fractures. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 2, 2021 New York, New York __________________________________ LORETTA A. PRESKA, U.S.D.J. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?