Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. Veeva Systems Inc. et al

Filing 730

ORDER granting 728 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Plaintiff's request for an extension to respond to Defendant's letter motion to seal is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant's letter motion no later than one week after the parties file an updated pretrial order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket No. 728. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/18/2021) (va)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-00589-LGS-RWL Document 730 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 2 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 United States Claudia Ray To Call Writer Directly: +1 212 446 4948 claudia.ray@kirkland.com +1 212 446 4800 www.kirkland.com Facsimile: +1 212 446 4900 November 16, 2021 Plaintiff's request for an extension to respond to Defendant's letter motion to seal is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant's letter motion no later than one week after the parties file an updated pretrial order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket No. 728. Dated: November 18, 2021 New York, New York By ECF Hon. Lorna G. Schofield U. S. District Court, Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Re: Medidata Solutions, Inc., et al. v. Veeva Sys. Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00589-LGS-RWL Dear Judge Schofield: Plaintiffs Medidata Solutions, Inc. and MDSOL Europe Limited (together, “Medidata”) respectfully write pursuant to Rule I.B.2 of the Court’s Individual Rules and Procedures for Civil Cases to request an extension of time to file a response to Defendant Veeva Systems, Inc.’s (“Veeva”) letter motion seeking permission to file under seal portions of Veeva’s exhibit list. See Dkt. 721. The original due date was November 16, 2021. Medidata has not previously requested that the Court extend this due date. Veeva advises that it does not oppose this request. On November 9, 2021, the Court ordered Medidata to file a response to Veeva’s letter, identifying any document names in Veeva’s exhibit list that require confidential treatment. See Dkt. 724. Medidata respectfully submits that good cause exists to grant it an extension to file its response in light of the Court’s recent Order adjourning sine die the deadline to file the updated pretrial order in this matter. See Dkt. 727. With respect the Court’s Order that Medidata publicly file its own exhibit list in redacted form with the updated pretrial order and file under seal the list without redactions, Dkt. 720 at 2, it is Medidata’s understanding that this deadline was adjourned by the Court’s Order from today, because the deadline to file the updated pretrial order was adjourned. Dkt. 727. Accordingly, Medidata respectfully requests that the Court grant it an extension of time to file its response to Veeva’s letter until, and consistent with, such new deadline to file the updated pretrial order as the Court may set. Austin Bay Area Beijing Boston Brussels Chicago Dallas Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Munich Paris Salt Lake City Shanghai Washington, D.C. Case 1:17-cv-00589-LGS-RWL Document 730 Filed 11/18/21 Page 2 of 2 Hon. Lorna G. Schofield November 16, 2021 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Claudia Ray Claudia Ray cc: All Counsel of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?