Knox v. John Varvatos Enterprises, Inc.

Filing 444

ORDER: The oral argument scheduled for May 25, 2022, at 3:30 p.m. is changed to a telephonic oral argument. At this date and time, the parties shall dial [phone] and use access code: 6642374. (The public may also dial in but will be permitte d only to listen.) When dialing in to the conference, the parties must be in a quiet indoor location and must not use a speakerphone. A telephone line and microphone technology with optimal quality should be used. The Court will record the proceed ing for purposes of transcription in the event a transcript is ordered. However, any other recording or dissemination of the proceeding in any form is forbidden. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Telephonic) Oral Argument set for 5/25/2022 at 03:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 5/16/2022) (ama)

Case 1:17-cv-00772-GWG Document 444 Filed 05/16/22 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
KNOX, et al.,
:
Plaintiffs,
-v.JOHN VARVATOS ENTERPRISES, INC.

:
:
:

ORDER
17 Civ. 772 (GWG)

Defendant.
:
---------------------------------------------------------------X
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The oral argument scheduled for May 25, 2022, at 3:30 p.m. is changed to a telephonic
oral argument. 1 At this date and time, the parties shall dial [phone] and use access code:
6642374. (The public may also dial in but will be permitted only to listen.) When dialing in to
the conference, the parties must be in a quiet indoor location and must not use a speakerphone.
A telephone line and microphone technology with optimal quality should be used. The Court
will record the proceeding for purposes of transcription in the event a transcript is ordered.
However, any other recording or dissemination of the proceeding in any form is forbidden.
Each attorney or unrepresented party is directed to ensure that all other attorneys or
unrepresented parties on the case are aware of the conference date and time.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 16, 2022
New York, New York

1

The Court has changed this conference to a telephonic conference because (1) the
Court assumes based on the notices of appearances that at least one of the attorneys is travelling
from out of town to New York for the argument and (2) there is a small chance the Court may
need to adjourn the argument at the last minute. If, in fact, the Court’s assumption that an
attorney is travelling out of town is incorrect, and there would be no hardship to a last minute
adjournment of a courtroom conference, the parties may request (if both sides agree) that the
argument be scheduled to take place in the courtroom.