Castro et al v. AABC Plumbing, Inc. et al

Filing 195

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 194 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations in favor of Ricardo Castro against AABC Construction, Inc., AABC Plumbing, Inc., Daniel Sheeri; in favor of Jeff Jackson against AABC Construction, Inc., AABC Plumbing, I nc., Daniel Sheeri; in favor of Jeff Jackson, Ricardo Castro against AABC Construction, Inc., AABC Plumbing, Inc., Daniel Sheeri in the amount of $740,353.67. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Amended Opinion & Order dated May 12, 2023, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. The awarded damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees are confirmed. Specifically, Plaintiff Castro is award ed the following: 1. Damages in the amount of $182,312.50, representing: a. $86,156.25 in overtime; b. $86,156.25 in liquidated damages; and c. $10,000.00 in statutory damages. 2. Pre-judgment interest calculated at the rate o f nine percent per annum on the unpaid wage sum of $86,156.25, to be calculated by the Clerk of Court from September 8, 2014, to the date of entry of the final judgment, in the amount of $67,364.75. 3. Post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Plaintiff Jackson is awarded the following: 1. Damages in the amount of $214,597.32, representing: a. $102,298.66 in unpaid wages and overtime; b. $102,298.66 in liquidated damages; and c. $10,000.00 in s tatutory damages. 2. Pre-judgment interest calculated at the rate of nine percent per annum on the unpaid wage sum of $102,298.66, to be calculated by the Clerk of Court from September 16, 2013, to the date of entry of the final judgment, in the amount of $89,067.10. 3. Post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Plaintiffs shall also be awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $187,012.00. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/15/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-01205-VSB-JW Document 195 Filed 05/15/23 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X RICARDO CASTRO, et al., -against- Plaintiff, AABC CONSTRUCTION, et al., 17 CIVIL 1205 (VSB)(JW) JUDGMENT Respondent. -----------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Amended Opinion & Order dated May 12, 2023, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. The awarded damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees are confirmed. Specifically, Plaintiff Castro is awarded the following: 1. Damages in the amount of $182,312.50, representing: a. $86,156.25 in overtime; b. $86,156.25 in liquidated damages; and c. $10,000.00 in statutory damages. 2. Pre-judgment interest calculated at the rate of nine percent per annum on the unpaid wage sum of $86,156.25, to be calculated by the Clerk of Court from September 8, 2014, to the date of entry of the final judgment, in the amount of $67,364.75. 3. Post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Plaintiff Jackson is awarded the following: 1. Damages in the amount of $214,597.32, representing: a. $102,298.66 in unpaid wages and overtime; b. $102,298.66 in liquidated damages; and c. $10,000.00 in statutory damages. 2. Pre-judgment interest calculated at the rate of nine percent per annum on the unpaid wage sum of $102,298.66, to be calculated by the Clerk of Court from September 16, 2013, to the date of entry of the final judgment, in the amount of Case 1:17-cv-01205-VSB-JW Document 195 Filed 05/15/23 Page 2 of 2 $89,067.10. 3. Post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Plaintiffs shall also be awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $187,012.00. Dated: New York, New York May 15, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK _________________________ Clerk of Court BY: _________________________ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?