Pacific Life Insurance Company et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon
Filing
215
SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: On December 4, 2020, the parties submitted a joint letter setting forth their respective positions regarding summary judgment briefing. After review of the parties' proposals, the following briefing schedule shall apply to the forthcoming summary judgment motions: Defendant shall file its summary judgment motion, with a memorandum of law not to exceed fifty (50) pages, 60 days after the resolution of the parties' pending Daubert motions [ECF Nos. 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, and 161], Plaintiffs shall file a combined cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment, with a memorandum of law not to exceed seventy-five (75) pages, 60 days after Defe ndant's summary judgment motion, Defendant shall file its opposition to Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment and reply in support of its motion for summary judgment, with a memorandum of law not to exceed fifty (50) pages, 60 da ys after Plaintiffs' opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment, Plaintiffs shall file a reply in support of their motion for summary judgment, with a memorandum of law not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, 30 days after Defendant's reply and opposition to Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 12/14/2020) (mml)
Case 1:17-cv-01388-KPF-RWL Document 215 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
x
:
PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and
:
PACIFIC LIFE & ANNUITY COMPANY,
:
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
-against:
:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
:
:
Defendant. :
x
Case No. 17-cv-01388-KPF -RWL
___________ SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
[PROPOSED]
On December 4, 2020, the parties submitted a joint letter setting forth their respective
positions regarding summary judgment briefing. After review of the parties’ proposals, the
following briefing schedule shall apply to the forthcoming summary judgment motions:
•
•
•
•
Defendant shall file its summary judgment motion, with a memorandum of law not to
exceed fifty (50) pages, 60 days after the resolution of the parties’ pending
Daubert motions [ECF Nos. 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, and 161],
Plaintiffs shall file a combined cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, with a memorandum of law not to exceed
seventy-five (75) pages, 60 days after Defendant’s summary judgment motion,
Defendant shall file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment and
reply in support of its motion for summary judgment, with a memorandum of law not to
exceed fifty (50) pages, 60 days after Plaintiffs’ opposition and cross-motion for
summary judgment,
Plaintiffs shall file a reply in support of their motion for summary judgment, with a
memorandum of law not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, 30 days after Defendant’s
reply and opposition to Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment.
SO ORDERED.
14
December ___, 2020
New York, New York
______________________________
12/14/2020
Katherine Polk Failla
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?