City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al

Filing 458

ORDER GRANTING AUTHORIZATION TO DISTRIBUTE THE FUNDS REMAINING IN THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND TO CY PRES RECIPIENT granting 454 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion is GRANTED. 2. The Court app roves payment of $867.37, the total amount of funds remaining in the Net Settlement Fund, to the Legal Aid Society from the Net Settlement Fund. 3. This Court retains jurisdiction over any further application or matter which may arise in connection with this Action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. 454. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 6/4/2024) (ks) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17-CV-1580 Hon. Lorna Schofield --------------------[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING AUTHORIZATION TODISTRIBUTE THE FUNDS REMAINING IN THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND TO CY PRES RECIPIENT Having considered all materials and arguments submitted in support of the Unopposed Motion to Distribute the Funds Remaining in the Net Settlement Fund to Cy Pres Recipient (the “Motion”), including the Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion, and the Declaration of Eric Nordskog Concerning the Remaining Funds for Cy Pres, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion is GRANTED. 2. The Court approves payment of $867.37, the total amount of funds remaining in the Net Settlement Fund, to the Legal Aid Society from the Net Settlement Fund. 3. This Court retains jurisdiction over any further application or matter which may arise in connection with this Action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. 454. SO ORDERED: DATED: June 4, 2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE HON. LORNA G. SCHOFIELD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?