Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. et al v. Pitsicalis et al

Filing 506

OPINION & ORDER re: 504 MOTION to Stay re: 496 Memorandum & Opinion, 502 MOTION to Vacate 496 Memorandum & Opinion: Defendants Tina Hendrix and Hendrix Music Academy have filed a motion to vacate the Court's January 11, 20 21 Opinion and Order ("Opinion and Order"), Dkt. 496. Plaintiffs are directed to file a response by February 2, 2021. In particular, the Court directs plaintiffs to respond to Tina Hendrix's factual allegation that she was not served w ith notice of the injunctions in this case until November 2020. Upon receiving plaintiffs' response, the Court will then determine whether to schedule a hearing. Tina Hendrix and Hendrix Music Academy have also moved for a stay as to the Court&# 039;s Opinion and Order finding the parties in civil contempt, pending the Court's decision on their motion to vacate and any appeal on this matter. The Court denies that motion, without prejudice. The Court notes that, insofar as the directives in the Opinion and Order track those in the permanent injunction binding Leon Hendrix's affiliates, see Dkt. 461, there is no occasion to stay those directives. And to the extent that the Opinion and Order directs Tina Hendrix, individually and on behalf of the Hendrix Music Academy, to submit a sworn declaration within 60 days of the Opinion and Order, that deadline is not imminently, and the Court expects to resolve Tina Hendrix's application to vacate the order well in advance of the deadline for submission of such a declaration. (Set Deadlines/Hearing 502 MOTION to Vacate: Responses due by 2/2/2021) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/26/2021) (jwh)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-01927-PAE-GWG Document 506 Filed 01/26/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EXPERIENCE HENDRIX, LLC and AUTHENTIC HENDRIX, LLC, Plaintiffs, -v- 17 Civ. 1927 (PAE) (GWG) OPINION & ORDER LEON HENDRIX, et al., Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Defendants Tina Hendrix and Hendrix Music Academy have filed a motion to vacate the Court’s January 11, 2021 Opinion and Order (“Opinion and Order”), Dkt. 496. Plaintiffs are directed to file a response by February 2, 2021. In particular, the Court directs plaintiffs to respond to Tina Hendrix’s factual allegation that she was not served with notice of the injunctions in this case until November 2020. Upon receiving plaintiffs’ response, the Court will then determine whether to schedule a hearing. Tina Hendrix and Hendrix Music Academy have also moved for a stay as to the Court’s Opinion and Order finding the parties in civil contempt, pending the Court’s decision on their motion to vacate and any appeal on this matter. The Court denies that motion, without prejudice. The Court notes that, insofar as the directives in the Opinion and Order track those in the permanent injunction binding Leon Hendrix’s affiliates, see Dkt. 461, there is no occasion to stay those directives. And to the extent that the Opinion and Order directs Tina Hendrix, individually and on behalf of the Hendrix Music Academy, to submit a sworn declaration within 60 days of the Opinion and Order, that deadline is not imminently, and the Court expects to resolve Tina Case 1:17-cv-01927-PAE-GWG Document 506 Filed 01/26/21 Page 2 of 2 Hendrix’s application to vacate the order well in advance of the deadline for submission of such a declaration. SO ORDERED. PaJA.� __________________________________ PAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge Dated: January 26, 2021 New York, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?