Henry v. The City of New York et al

Filing 114

ORDER: granting 113 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/10/2020) (ama)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-03450-JGK-SDA Document 114 Filed 12/10/20 Page 1 of 2 THE CITY OF NEW YORK JAMES E. JO HNSON Corporation Counsel MARYBETH ALLEN Senior Counsel Phone: (212) 356-2662 Fax: (212) 356-3159 Email: mallenk@law.nyc.gov LAW DEPARTMENT 100 CHURCH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 December 9, 2020 VIA ECF Honorable John G. Koeltl United States District Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: Your Honor: Application granted. SO ORDERED December 10, 2020 New York, NY /s/ John G. Koeltl John G. Koeltl U.S.D.J. Levar Henry v. City of New York, et al. 17 Civ. 3450 (JGK) (SDA) I am a Senior Counsel in the Special Federal Litigation Division of the New York City Law Department, and the attorney assigned to the defense of the above-referenced matter. Defendants write to respectfully request a brief extension of one week to file their Motion for summary judgment, i.e., from December 11, 2020 to and including December 18, 2020. Defendants contacted Plaintiff to obtain his consent for this application. However, it appears that Plaintiff believes he is still represented by counsel because he would not discuss the extension with defense counsel. Instead, Plaintiff referred counsel to his former pro bono attorney, who as the Court is aware, no longer represents Plaintiff in this matter. 1 Defendants submitted a pre-motion application on October 28, 2020, regarding their anticipated motion for summary judgment. The Court held a pre-motion conference, via telephone, on November 4, 2020. Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated November 5, 2020, Defendants’ motion is due on December 11, 2020. However due to other work obligations, that arose after Defendants agreed to the motion schedule, including motion practice on other matters, Defendants’ are unable to complete the motion within the currently proscribed timeframe. 1 Defendants will continue their attempts to communicate with Plaintiff by telephone and mail. Case 1:17-cv-03450-JGK-SDA Document 114 Filed 12/10/20 Page 2 of 2 Should the Court grant Defendants’ application, endorsement of the following revised motion schedule: • • • Defendants seek the Court’s Defendants to serve their motion by December 18, 2020; Plaintiff to serve his opposition by January 15, 2021; and Defendants to serve their reply, if any, no later than February 5, 2021. Defendants thank the Court for its time and consideration herein. Respectfully submitted, MaryBeth Allen /s MaryBeth Allen Senior Counsel Special Federal Litigation Division cc: VIA MAIL Levar T. Henry Pro Se Plaintiff 85 Delray Drive Mount Vernon, New York 10552 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?