Enriquez v. City Of New York et al

Filing 94

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: It has been reported to this Court by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron that the Parties have agreed to a settlement of this case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by November 23, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 9/22/2020) (mro)

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 9/22/2020

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
DIANGELO ENRIQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
-against-

1:17-cv-04293-MKV

CITY OF NEW YORK, CHARLES HIRSCH,
BARBARA SAMPSON, DIANA HO,
CHRISTOPHER KAMNICK, and DOES 1-2,

ORDER OF
DISMISSAL

Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
It has been reported to this Court by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron that the Parties
have agreed to a settlement of this case.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is discontinued without costs to any party and
without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the
action is made by November 23, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s
dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d
492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED.
Date: September 22, 2020
New York, NY

_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge