Lyons v. Davis et al
Filing 31
OPINION & ORDER re: 15 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Richard Rosado, Otis Cruz, Arnold Hamilton, William Davis. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion is granted. The Court need not reach Defendants' various other bases for dismissal. The Court has been mindful of Plaintiff's pro se status. Nonetheless, these claims are dismissed with prejudice because any amendment would be futile. See Singh v. New York City Dist. Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds, No. 17-CV-7159 (VSB), 2018 WL 4335511, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2018). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket entry fifteen and to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/30/2018) (rj) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
