DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al

Filing 191

ORDER REGARDING REDACTION: On or before October 1, 2021, after meeting and conferring, the parties shall submit (by email) their proposed redactions to the Opinion and Order before it is publicly filed, mindful that such redactions should be mini mized, wherever possible, in light of the presumption of public access to judicial documents. See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47-48 (2d Cir. 2019); Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 9/24/2021) (rro)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

9/24/21

DOUBLELINE CAPITAL LP, et al.
Plaintiffs,
-againstODEBRECHT FINANCE, LTD., et al.,

17-CV-4576 (GHW) (BCM)
ORDER REGARDING REDACTION

Defendants.
BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.
I have filed, under seal, an Opinion and Order (Dkt. No. 190) (1) granting defendants'
motion for a protective order with respect to plaintiffs' discovery requests for documents and data
from the "Drousys" file system (Dkt. No. 130) and (2) denying as moot plaintiffs' letter-application
for what would be a second order compelling defendants to produce documents responsive to
plaintiffs' Requests for Production 1, 3, and 4. (Dkt. No. 167.)
The Opinion and Order is, at present, accessible only to the attorneys appearing for the
parties and Court personnel, because it discusses a series of decisions issued by the 13th Federal
Court of Curitiba in Brazil (the "Curitiba Court") with regard to the Leniency Agreement between
defendants herein and Brazilian prosecutors, which the Curitiba Court authorized Odebrecht to
disclose to this Court and to plaintiffs herein only on a "confidential basis," as well as certain
related material, all of which was itself filed under seal. (See Dkt. Nos. 129, 169, 179.)
On or before October 1, 2021, after meeting and conferring, the parties shall submit (by
email) their proposed redactions to the Opinion and Order before it is publicly filed, mindful that
such redactions should be minimized, wherever possible, in light of the presumption of public
access to judicial documents. See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47-48 (2d Cir. 2019); Lugosch
v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006).
Dated: New York, New York
September 24, 2021

SO ORDERED.

________________________________
BARBARA MOSES
United States Magistrate Judge