DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al

Filing 288

ORDER: As discussed at the April 6, 2023 conference, the deadline for Defendants to file their anticipated Daubert motion to exclude the opinions of Plaintiffs' damages expert is June 5, 2023. Plaintiffs' opposition is due no later than t hirty days following the date of filing and service of Defendants' motion; Defendants' reply, if any, is due no later than thirty days following the filing and service of Plaintiffs' opposition. The Court will take up any applicatio ns for motions for summary judgment after the resolution of Defendants' Daubert motion. In addition, as the Daubert motion is non-dispositive, the Court will refer it by separate order to the assigned magistrate judge for resolution. See, e.g., Israel v. Springs Indus., Inc., No. 98-cv-5106, 2007 WL 9724896, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 30, 2007).( Motions due by 6/5/2023.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 4/6/2023) (rro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- X : DOUBLELINE CAPITAL LP, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : -v : : CONSTRUTORA NORBERTO ODEBRECHT, : S.A., et al., : : Defendants. : : ----------------------------------------------------------------- X GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 4/6/2023 1:17-cv-4576-GHW ORDER As discussed at the April 6, 2023 conference, the deadline for Defendants to file their anticipated Daubert motion to exclude the opinions of Plaintiffs’ damages expert is June 5, 2023. Plaintiffs’ opposition is due no later than thirty days following the date of filing and service of Defendants’ motion; Defendants’ reply, if any, is due no later than thirty days following the filing and service of Plaintiffs’ opposition. The Court will take up any applications for motions for summary judgment after the resolution of Defendants’ Daubert motion. In addition, as the Daubert motion is non-dispositive, the Court will refer it by separate order to the assigned magistrate judge for resolution. See, e.g., Israel v. Springs Indus., Inc., No. 98-cv-5106, 2007 WL 9724896, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 30, 2007). SO ORDERED. Dated: April 6, 2023 New York, New York __________________________________ GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?