Desvarieux v. Axiom Holdings, Inc. et al
Filing
67
ORDER AUTHORIZING DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION: This matter having been commenced by the filing of a complaint on June 22, 2020, and the defendant Axiom Holdings, Inc., having failed to interpose a timely answer to the complaint or otherwise move in this proceeding, and the plaintiff having sought permission to move for a default judgment against defendant Axiom Holdings, Inc., and the Court having determined that an investigation of the factual basis of the allegations of the complaint herein pursua nt to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) is appropriate, it is hereby ORDERED, that the plaintiff may make a motion for a default judgment; and it is further ORDERED, that the plaintiff's motion must be accompanied by evidence, in admissible form, of such facts as it would have proffered to meet its burden of proof on its direct case had a trial been held in this action; and it is further ORDERED, that such motion for default judgment must be served on the defendants and must be accompanied by copies of the Clerk's Certificate and of proof of service of the summons and complaint and the motion for default judgment as provided by the undersigned's Individual Practices Rules; and it is further ORDERED, that said motion shall be briefed i n accordance with the schedule set forth in Local Civil Rule 6.1 and will be taken on submission unless otherwise directed by the Court; and it is further ORDERED, that plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order on defendants and file proof of such service within fourteen (14) days from the date hereof. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/07/2020) (ama)
Case 1:17-cv-04756-LTS-GWG Document 67 Filed 07/07/20 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------x
ASHLEY DESVARIEUX, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
No. 17 Civ. 4756 (LTS)(GWG)
Plaintiffs,
-vAXIOM HOLDINGS, INC. and CURTIS
RILEY,
ORDER
AUTHORIZING DEFAULT
JUDGMENT MOTION
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------x
This matter having been commenced by the filing of a complaint on June 22,
2020, and the defendant Axiom Holdings, Inc., having failed to interpose a timely answer to the
complaint or otherwise move in this proceeding, and the plaintiff having sought permission to
move for a default judgment against defendant Axiom Holdings, Inc., and the Court having
determined that an investigation of the factual basis of the allegations of the complaint herein
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) is appropriate, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the plaintiff may make a motion for a default judgment; and it is
further
ORDERED, that the plaintiff's motion must be accompanied by evidence, in
admissible form, of such facts as it would have proffered to meet its burden of proof on its direct
case had a trial been held in this action; and it is further
ORDERED, that such motion for default judgment must be served on the
defendants and must be accompanied by copies of the Clerk's Certificate and of proof of service
of the summons and complaint and the motion for default judgment as provided by the
undersigned's Individual Practices Rules; and it is further
ORDERED, that said motion shall be briefed in accordance with the schedule set
forth in Local Civil Rule 6.1 and will be taken on submission unless otherwise directed by the
Court; and it is further
DESVARIEUX - ORDER
VERSION JULY 7, 2020
1
Case 1:17-cv-04756-LTS-GWG Document 67 Filed 07/07/20 Page 2 of 3
ORDERED, that plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order on defendants and file
proof of such service within fourteen (14) days from the date hereof.
Dated: New York, New York
July 7, 2020
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
United States District Judge
DESVARIEUX - ORDER
VERSION JULY 7, 2020
2
Case 1:17-cv-04756-LTS-GWG Document 67 Filed 07/07/20 Page 3 of 3
DESVARIEUX - ORDER
VERSION JULY 7, 2020
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?