Service v. Noeth

Filing 27

ORDER: Each party is directed to file a separate letter by Friday, January 24, 2020, updating the Court on the status of Petitioner's state court litigation to the best of the party's knowledge, including by stating whether the Court of Appeals has responded to Petitioner's letter requesting an extension of time to appeal, dated September 23, 2019. See ECF No. 26. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 1/6/2020) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ras)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X 1/6/2020 MICHAEL SERVICE, Plaintiff, -against- 17-CV-04941 (PGG)(SN) ORDER JOSEPH NOETH, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------X SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On February 5, 2018, the Court stayed all litigation deadlines pending the state court’s resolution of Petitioner’s coram nobis petition. ECF No. 21. Nearly two years have passed, and the Court has still not received confirmation as to whether Petitioner has actually filed a coram nobis petition, in part because Petitioner has made more than one request to the Court of Appeals for extensions of time to file and to appeal the Court of Appeals’ denial of the petition. Accordingly, each party is directed to file a separate letter by Friday, January 24, 2020, updating the Court on the status of Petitioner’s state court litigation to the best of the party’s knowledge, including by stating whether the Court of Appeals has responded to Petitioner’s letter requesting an extension of time to appeal, dated September 23, 2019. See ECF No. 26. SO ORDERED. DATED: January 6, 2020 New York, New York cc: Michael Service (By Chambers) No. 11-A-0310 Five Points Correctional Facility 6600 State Route 96 Romulus, NY 14541

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?