Rahman et al v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc. et al

Filing 98

ORDER: On April 28, 2020, Magistrate Judge Moses held a telephonic conference with all parties. Although Plaintiffs appeared through counsel and the Individual Defendants appeared pro se, Defendant Red Chili did not appear at the conference, and the Individual Defendants "confirmed that Red Chili had no counsel to represent it." See Dkt. 97 at 1 & n.1. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment against Defendant Red Chili Indian Caf, Inc. is hereby granted. Because th e case against the Individual Defendants is ongoing, the Court defers ruling on damages at this time. Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants and file proof of service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/30/2020) (rj)

Case 1:17-cv-05156-RA-BCM Document 98 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MAHFUJUR RAHMAN AND LITON SHAH,

USDC-SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 4-30-20

Plaintiffs,
No. 17-CV-5156 (RA)

v.
RED CHILI INDIAN CAFÉ, INC.,
MOHAMMED MOJNU MIAH a/k/a SHEIKH
MOHAMMED MOJNU, AND NOOR ISLAM
a/k/a MOHAMMED HARUN MIAH,

ORDER

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:
Plaintiffs Mahfujur Rahman and Liton Shah filed this action against Defendants Red Chili
Indian Cafe, Inc. (“Red Chili”), Mohammed Mojnu Miah, and Noor Islam, seeking relief under
the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York Labor Law (“NYLL”). On September 22,
2017, Defendants Miah and Islam (the “Individual Defendants”), proceeding pro se, filed a Joint
Answer and Affirmative Defenses, which was subsequently stricken, see Dkts. 61, 66, and then
reinstated, see Dkt. 92. Defendant Red Chili never answered or otherwise appeared in this action,
despite being advised several times that “a corporation may not appear in a lawsuit against it except
through an attorney, and that, where a corporation repeatedly fails to appear by counsel, a default
judgment may be entered against it” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. See Grace v.
Bank Leumi Trust Co. of N.Y., 443 F. 3d 180, 192 (2d Cir. 2006) (citation omitted); see also, e.g.,
Dkts. 28, 30, 34, 42, 66, 88, 90.
Plaintiffs moved for a default judgment against all Defendants on January 3, 2020. See
Dkt. 71. On February 10, 2020, the Court held a conference ordering the defaulting Defendants

Case 1:17-cv-05156-RA-BCM Document 98 Filed 04/30/20 Page 2 of 2

to show cause as to why a default judgment should not be entered in favor of Plaintiffs. In light
of the fact that the Individual Defendants appeared at that conference, the Court denied Plaintiffs’
motion for a default judgment on February 26, 2020, and gave Defendant Red Chili “one more
opportunity to find counsel to represent it in this action, which it must, given that a corporation
may not proceed pro se.” See Dkt. 88. The Court also advised Defendant Red Chili that if it did
not obtain representation and file a responsive pleading by April 27, 2020, the Court would grant
Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment against it. See id.
On April 28, 2020, Magistrate Judge Moses held a telephonic conference with all parties.
Although Plaintiffs appeared through counsel and the Individual Defendants appeared pro se,
Defendant Red Chili did not appear at the conference, and the Individual Defendants “confirmed
that Red Chili had no counsel to represent it.” See Dkt. 97 at 1 & n.1. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’
motion for a default judgment against Defendant Red Chili Indian Café, Inc. is hereby granted.
Because the case against the Individual Defendants is ongoing, the Court defers ruling on damages
at this time.
Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants and file proof of service on the
docket.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 30, 2020
New York, New York
RONNIE ABRAMS
United States District Judge