Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al

Filing 3

RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.(Jaffer, Jameel)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY; REBECCA BUCKWALTER; PHILIP COHEN; HOLLY FIGUEROA; EUGENE GU; BRANDON NEELY; JOSEPH PAPP; and NICHOLAS PAPPAS, Civil Action No. __________ Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States; SEAN M. SPICER, White House Press Secretary; and DANIEL SCAVINO, White House Director of Social Media and Assistant to the President, Defendants. RULE 7.1 STATEMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 (formerly Local General Rule 1.9) and to enable District Judges and Magistrate Judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, the undersigned counsel for the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University (a private non-governmental party) certifies that the Knight First Amendment Institute has no parent companies, subsidiaries, or affiliates which have any outstanding 1 securities in the hands of the public. Dated: July 11, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jameel Jaffer Jameel Jaffer (JJ-4653) Katherine Fallow (application for admission forthcoming) Alex Abdo (AA-0527) Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University 314 Low Library 535 West 116th Street New York, NY 10027 (212) 854-9600 jameel.jaffer@knightcolumbia.org katie.fallow@knightcolumbia.org alex.abdo@knightcolumbia.org Jessica Ring Amunson (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) Tassity S. Johnson (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) Jenner & Block LLP 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 639-6000 jamunson@jenner.com tjohnson@jenner.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?