Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al

Filing 63

LETTER addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from Jameel Jaffer dated February 26, 2018 re: Counsel for Plaintiffs division of time during the March 8, 2018 oral argument on the pending cross-motions for summary judgment. Document filed by Rebecca Buckwalter, Philip Cohen, Holly Figueroa, Eugene Gu, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, Brandon Neely, Joseph Papp, Nicholas Pappas.(Jaffer, Jameel)

Download PDF
February 26, 2018 Via ECF and by Fax The Honorable Naomi Reice Buchwald United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 2270 New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Knight First Amendment Institute, et al. v. Trump, et al., Case No. 17-CV-5205 (NRB) Dear Judge Buchwald, Counsel for Plaintiffs seek the Court’s leave to divide their time during oral argument on the pending cross-motions for summary judgment, scheduled for 11:00 A.M. on March 8, 2018, as follows: Ms. Fallow will address all issues relating to Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims, and Mr. Jaffer will address all issues relating to the Government’s jurisdictional objections. Counsel for the Government does not object to this proposal. Plaintiffs thank the Court for considering it. Respectfully, Jessica Ring Amunson (pro hac vice) Tassity S. Johnson (pro hac vice) Jenner & Block LLP 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 /s/ Jameel Jaffer Jameel Jaffer (JJ-4653) Katherine Fallow (KF-2535) Carrie DeCell (admission pending) Alex Abdo (AA-0527) Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 302 New York, NY 10115 (646) 745-8500 Jameel.Jaffer@knightcolumbia.org Counsel for Plaintiffs 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 302, New York, NY 10115 | (646) 745-8500 | jameel.jaffer@knightcolumbia.org

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?