Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al
Filing
63
LETTER addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from Jameel Jaffer dated February 26, 2018 re: Counsel for Plaintiffs division of time during the March 8, 2018 oral argument on the pending cross-motions for summary judgment. Document filed by Rebecca Buckwalter, Philip Cohen, Holly Figueroa, Eugene Gu, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, Brandon Neely, Joseph Papp, Nicholas Pappas.(Jaffer, Jameel)
February 26, 2018
Via ECF and by Fax
The Honorable Naomi Reice Buchwald
United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street, Room 2270
New York, NY 10007-1312
Re:
Knight First Amendment Institute, et al. v. Trump,
et al., Case No. 17-CV-5205 (NRB)
Dear Judge Buchwald,
Counsel for Plaintiffs seek the Court’s leave to divide their time
during oral argument on the pending cross-motions for summary judgment,
scheduled for 11:00 A.M. on March 8, 2018, as follows: Ms. Fallow will
address all issues relating to Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims, and Mr.
Jaffer will address all issues relating to the Government’s jurisdictional
objections. Counsel for the Government does not object to this proposal.
Plaintiffs thank the Court for considering it.
Respectfully,
Jessica Ring Amunson (pro hac
vice)
Tassity S. Johnson (pro hac vice)
Jenner & Block LLP
1099 New York Avenue, NW,
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20001
/s/ Jameel Jaffer
Jameel Jaffer (JJ-4653)
Katherine Fallow (KF-2535)
Carrie DeCell (admission pending)
Alex Abdo (AA-0527)
Knight First Amendment Institute
at Columbia University
475 Riverside Drive, Suite 302
New York, NY 10115
(646) 745-8500
Jameel.Jaffer@knightcolumbia.org
Counsel for Plaintiffs
475 Riverside Drive, Suite 302, New York, NY 10115 | (646) 745-8500 | jameel.jaffer@knightcolumbia.org
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?