Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al
Filing
64
MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: #63 Letter, filed by Joseph Papp, Brandon Neely, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, Eugene Gu, Philip Cohen, Nicholas Pappas, Holly Figueroa, Rebecca Buckwalter. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/1/2018) (ap)
Case 1:17-cv-05205-NRB Document 64 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 1
KNIGHT
FIRST AMENDMENT
INSTITUTE
at Columbia University
February 26, 2018
Via ECF and by Fax
The Honorable Naomi Reice Buchwald
United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street, Room 2270
New York, NY 10007-1312
Re:
USDC SD.\ 1
DOCUME~T
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATEFILED:
\ \
7)\\\\~
Knight First Amendment Institute, et al. v. Trump,
et al., Case No. 17-CV-5205 (NRB)
Dear Judge Buchwald,
A~,-~~
Counsel for Plaintiffs seek the Court's leave to divide their time
during oral argument on the pending cross-motions for summary judgment, ~ ,
scheduled for 11 :00 A.M. on March 8, 2018, as follows: Ms. Fallow will
~ ,
address all issues relating to Plaintiffs' First Amendment claims, and Mr. 1...nu,s......-~•~e-,
Jaffer will address all issues relating to the Government's jurisdictional
,d---objections. Counsel for the Government does not object to this proposal. c:[)<..eh~ I
Plaintiffs thank the Court for considering it.
~~
3/}r
Respectfully,
Jessica Ring Arnunson (pro hac
vice)
Tassity S. Johnson (pro hac vice)
Jenner & Block LLP
1099 New York Avenue, NW,
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20001
Isl Jameel Jaffer
Jameel Jaffer (JJ-4653)
Katherine Fallow (KF-2535)
Carrie DeCell (admission pending)
Alex Abdo (AA-0527)
Knight First Amendment Institute
at Columbia University
475 Riverside Drive, Suite 302
New York, NY 10115
(646) 745-8500
Jameel.Jaffer@knightcolumbia.org
Counsel for Plaintiffs
475 Riverside Dnve, Smte 302, New York, NY 10115 I (646) 745-8500 I Jameel.Jaffer@kmghtcolumb1aorg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?