Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al

Filing 64

MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: 63 Letter, filed by Joseph Papp, Brandon Neely, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, Eugene Gu, Philip Cohen, Nicholas Pappas, Holly Figueroa, Rebecca Buckwalter. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/1/2018) (ap)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-05205-NRB Document 64 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 1 KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE at Columbia University February 26, 2018 Via ECF and by Fax The Honorable Naomi Reice Buchwald United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 2270 New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: USDC SD.\ 1 DOCUME~T ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATEFILED: \ \ 7)\\\\~ Knight First Amendment Institute, et al. v. Trump, et al., Case No. 17-CV-5205 (NRB) Dear Judge Buchwald, A~,-~~ Counsel for Plaintiffs seek the Court's leave to divide their time during oral argument on the pending cross-motions for summary judgment, ~ , scheduled for 11 :00 A.M. on March 8, 2018, as follows: Ms. Fallow will ~ , address all issues relating to Plaintiffs' First Amendment claims, and Mr.,s......-~•~e-, Jaffer will address all issues relating to the Government's jurisdictional ,d---objections. Counsel for the Government does not object to this proposal. c:[)< I Plaintiffs thank the Court for considering it. ~~ 3/}r Respectfully, Jessica Ring Arnunson (pro hac vice) Tassity S. Johnson (pro hac vice) Jenner & Block LLP 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 Isl Jameel Jaffer Jameel Jaffer (JJ-4653) Katherine Fallow (KF-2535) Carrie DeCell (admission pending) Alex Abdo (AA-0527) Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 302 New York, NY 10115 (646) 745-8500 Counsel for Plaintiffs 475 Riverside Dnve, Smte 302, New York, NY 10115 I (646) 745-8500 I Jameel.Jaffer@kmghtcolumb1aorg

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?