Abraham v. Leigh et al

Filing 537

ORDER: The Court has reviewed its scheduling Order dated July 24, 2020 (Dkt. #515), and recognizes that it permitted Plaintiff to file a response in support of her motions for reconsideration on or by August 14, 2020. The Court therefore accepts Pl aintiff's reply dated August 14, 2020 (Dkt. #535), and withdraws its incorrect prior Order dated August 17, 2020, rejecting Plaintiff's reply (Dkt. #536), with apologies to the parties for any inconvenience or confusion caused by the Order docketed at No. 536. For the sake of clarity, the Court will consider Plaintiff's reply brief (Dkt. #535), in deciding Plaintiff's motions for reconsideration and disqualification of the Court. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/17/2020) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-05429-KPF Document 537 Filed 08/17/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBYN ABRAHAM, Plaintiff, 17 Civ. 5429 (KPF) -v.- ORDER ABBY LEIGH, et al., Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: The Court has reviewed its scheduling Order dated July 24, 2020 (Dkt. #515), and recognizes that it permitted Plaintiff to file a response in support of her motions for reconsideration on or by August 14, 2020. The Court therefore accepts Plaintiff’s reply dated August 14, 2020 (Dkt. #535), and withdraws its incorrect prior Order dated August 17, 2020, rejecting Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. #536), with apologies to the parties for any inconvenience or confusion caused by the Order docketed at No. 536. For the sake of clarity, the Court will consider Plaintiff’s reply brief (Dkt. #535), in deciding Plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration and disqualification of the Court. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 17, 2020 New York, New York __________________________________ KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?