Abraham v. Leigh et al

Filing 743

ORDER: On December 2, 2022, Plaintiff submitted a letter to the Court, requesting that the Court terminate Joshua Douglass as counsel of record in this case. (Dkt. #735). That letter indicates that Mr. Douglass has refused to communicate with Plai ntiff about this case, and that he has threatened Plaintiff. (Id.). Plaintiff made similar representations in two motions she filed with the Court on December 5, 2022. (Dkt. #737-738). Finally, on December 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed a supplemental mo tion to terminate Mr. Douglass as counsel of record. (Dkt. #742). Accordingly, in line with Local Rule 1.4, Mr. Douglass is ORDERED to respond to Plaintiff's aforementioned letters and motions by December 14, 2022. In his response, Mr. Douglas s shall address the issues of reparability of his relationship with Plaintiff and whether he is asserting a retaining or charging lien for his work associated with this case. (Responses due by 12/14/2022) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/12/2022) (rro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBYN ABRAHAM, Plaintiff, -v.ABBY LEIGH, in her Individual Capacity, as Executrix of the Estate of Mitch Leigh, and as Trustee for The Viola Fund and Abby Leigh Ltd., 17 Civ. 5429 (KPF) ORDER Defendant. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: On December 2, 2022, Plaintiff submitted a letter to the Court, requesting that the Court terminate Joshua Douglass as counsel of record in this case. (Dkt. #735). That letter indicates that Mr. Douglass has refused to communicate with Plaintiff about this case, and that he has threatened Plaintiff. (Id.). Plaintiff made similar representations in two motions she filed with the Court on December 5, 2022. (Dkt. #737-738). Finally, on December 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed a supplemental motion to terminate Mr. Douglass as counsel of record. (Dkt. #742). Accordingly, in line with Local Rule 1.4, Mr. Douglass is ORDERED to respond to Plaintiff’s aforementioned letters and motions by December 14, 2022. In his response, Mr. Douglass shall address the issues of reparability of his relationship with Plaintiff and whether he is asserting a retaining or charging lien for his work associated with this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 12, 2022 New York, New York KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?