Knopf et al v. Esposito et al
Filing
252
ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Mr. Esposito's request is denied. (And as further set forth herein.) (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/30/2020) (jca)
Case 1:17-cv-05833-DLC Document 252 Filed 12/30/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------- X
:
NORMA KNOPF and MICHAEL KNOPF,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
-v:
:
FRANK M. ESPOSITO, DORSEY & WHITNEY,
:
LLP, NATHANIEL H. AKERMAN, EDWARD S.
:
FELDMAN, and MICHAEL HAYDEN SANFORD,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
-------------------------------------- X
17cv5833(DLC)
ORDER
DENISE COTE, District Judge:
In a letter of December 29, 2020, defendant Frank Esposito
requested that the Court endorse a Stipulation and Proposed
Order regarding the redaction and sealing of certain
electronically filed documents in the above-captioned case.
Pursuant to Section 8 of this Court’s Individual Practices,
motions for approval of sealed or redacted filings in civil
cases must be filed in public view, must explain the particular
reasons for seeking to file that information under seal, and
should not include confidential information sought to be filed
under seal.
Supporting papers must be separately filed
electronically and may be filed under seal or redacted only to
the extent necessary to safeguard information sought to be filed
under seal.
Case 1:17-cv-05833-DLC Document 252 Filed 12/30/20 Page 2 of 2
The December 29 request failed to explain the particular
reasons for seeking the redaction or sealing of the material, as
required by Section 8 of this Court’s Individual Practices.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Mr. Esposito’s request is denied.
Dated:
New York, New York
December 30, 2020
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?