Knopf et al v. Esposito et al

Filing 323

ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that, by February 3, 2021, the plaintiffs shall submit a new motion to redact that (1) properly describes the documents to which the request refers and (2) includes a description of the reasons underlying the request or i ncorporates the reasons set forth in another publicly filed document, such as the plaintiffs January 19, 2021 application. (And as further set forth herein.) (Motions due by 2/3/2021.), Motions terminated: 319 LETTER MOTION to Seal Response to Esposito's Motion for a Stay addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from Eric Berry dated February 1, 2021. filed by Michael Knopf, Norma Knopf. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 2/2/2021) (jca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------- X
:
NORMA KNOPF and MICHAEL KNOPF,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
-v:
:
FRANK M. ESPOSITO, DORSEY & WHITNEY,
:
LLP, NATHANIEL H. AKERMAN, EDWARD S.
:
FELDMAN, and MICHAEL HAYDEN SANFORD,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
-------------------------------------- X

17cv5833(DLC)
ORDER

DENISE COTE, District Judge:
In a letter of February 1, 2021, the plaintiffs moved to
redact portions of their response to Frank Esposito’s motion to
stay.

The plaintiffs’ motion to redact does not properly

identify the document to which the request refers, nor does it
provide reasons for the proposed redactions.

It is hereby

ORDERED that, by February 3, 2021, the plaintiffs shall
submit a new motion to redact that (1) properly describes the
documents to which the request refers and (2) includes a
description of the reasons underlying the request or
incorporates the reasons set forth in another publicly filed
document, such as the plaintiffs’ January 19, 2021 application.

Dated:

New York, New York
February 2, 2021