Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Wetherall Contracting of NY Inc.

Filing 14

ORDER AND JUDGMENT: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition is granted, the underlying arbitration award is confirmed, and judgment is entered in favor of Petitioners and against Respondent as follows: 1. Awarding Petitioners $1,7 90,789.71 pursuant to the July 7, 2017, arbitration award plus interest from the date of the award through the date of judgment with interest to accrue at an annual rate of 5.75%; 2. Awarding Petitioners $75 in costs; 3. Awarding Petitioner s $382.50 in attorneys' fees; and 4. Awarding Petitioners post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. Petitioners are directed to serve copies of this Order by mail on Respondent. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 4/19/2018) (ama)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY
DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND,
ANNUITY FUND, AND APPRENTICESHIP,
JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING,
EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, et
al.,
Petitioners,

17-CV-6198 (JPO)
ORDER AND JUDGMENT

-vWETHERALL CONTRACTING OF NY INC.,
Respondent.
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
Petitioners commenced this action to confirm and enforce an arbitration award against
Respondent Wetherall Contracting of NY Inc. (“Wetherall”). The underlying dispute stems from
Respondent’s failure permit an audit to ensure compliance with its obligations under a collective
bargaining agreement, which required it to make contributions to benefits funds. (Dkt. No. 1
¶ 11, 18.) Wetherall did not appear at the arbitration, despite having received notice. (Dkt. No.
1-5 at 2.) The arbitrator found in favor of Petitioners and awarded them a total of $1,790,789.71.
(Id. at 3.)
In this action, Wetherall was served on August 18, 2017 (Dkt. No. 8), but, to date, it has
not filed an appearance or otherwise responded to the petition. Petitioners have therefore
requested that the Court treat the petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. (Dkt.
No. 9.)
The Second Circuit has noted that, when a petition to confirm an arbitration award is
supported by an adequate record, it should be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment

1

based on the movant’s submissions.” D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir.
2006). Here, Petitioners have supplied a full record, including: the project agreement between
Wetherall and the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO (“the
union”) (Dkt. No. 1-1); the union’s collective bargaining agreement, which was incorporated into
the project agreement (Dkt. No. 1-2); Petitioners’ collection policy, which is incorporated into
the collective bargaining agreement and provides for the right to an audit (Dkt. No. 1-3); a copy
of the notice of hearing before the arbitrator (Dkt. No. 1-4); the opinion and award of the
arbitrator (Dkt. No. 1-5); and the contemporaneous time and expense records of Petitioners’
attorneys (Dkt. No. 1-6).
The Court has reviewed the record, including the reasoning of the arbitrator, who found
that Wetherall “refused to have its company’s Books & Records examined by [Petitioners’]
auditors and continued to deny [Petitioners] permission for an audit within seven days of
[Petitioners’] written notice.” (Dkt. No. 1-5 at 2.) The arbitrator also calculated, based on the
evidence presented, the total amount to which Petitioners are entitled, and these findings support
the amount of the judgment and post-award interest sought by Petitioners here. (Id. at 2–3.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition is granted, the
underlying arbitration award is confirmed, and judgment is entered in favor of Petitioners and
against Respondent as follows:
1. Awarding Petitioners $1,790,789.71 pursuant to the July 7, 2017, arbitration award
plus interest from the date of the award through the date of judgment with interest to
accrue at an annual rate of 5.75%;
2. Awarding Petitioners $75 in costs;
3. Awarding Petitioners $382.50 in attorneys’ fees; and

2

4. Awarding Petitioners post-judgment interest at the statutory rate.
Petitioners are directed to serve copies of this Order by mail on Respondent.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 19, 2018
New York, New York

____________________________________
J. PAUL OETKEN
United States District Judge

3