Love Funding Corporation v. Jones

Filing 21

OPINION AND ORDER: By letter motion dated November 30, 2017, defendant sought reconsideration of the Court's denial of his motion for leave to seek Rule 11 sanctions, see Order dated Nov. 28, 2017. Defendant's motion does not identify any & quot;controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked." Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). Accordingly, while the Court is not unsympathetic to the difficulties to which defendant has been put, the Court sees no basis to reconsider its prior determination. This, however, in no way excuses the somewhat cavalier approach that plaintiff's counsel has taken to this litigation. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 12/1/2017) (ap)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- x LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION, Pla1nt1ff, -v- 17 Civ. 7437(JSR) --..0.I?.J.NI-GN-..,AND ORDER WILLIAM E. JONES, JR., By letter motion dated November 30, 2017, defendant sought reconsideration of the Court's denial of his motion for leave to seek Rule 11 sanctions, see Order dated Nov. 28, 2017. Defendant's motion does not identify any "controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked." Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). Accordingly, while the Court is not unsympathetic to the difficulties to which defendant has been put, the Court sees no basis to reconsider its prior determination. This, however, in no way excuses the somewhat cavalier approach that plaintiff's counsel has taken to this litigation. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, NY December ..L_, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?