Saray Dokum ve Madeni Aksam Sanayi Turizm A.S. v. MTS Logistics, Inc.

Filing 186

ORDER: The Court received an email from Plaintiff declining to submit revised Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law but noting that Plaintiff's original Proposed Findings of Fact are "more fully substantiated following the re opening of discovery." Plaintiff's email also included a deposition transcript of Mr. Murat Sarayli, as well as a summary of relevant excerpts. By September 30, 2022, Plaintiff shall submit a revised Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law incorporating the citations to Mr. Sarayli's deposition transcript where relevant. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 9/28/2022) (kv)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-07495-JPC-GWG Document 186 Filed 09/28/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : SARAY DOKUM VE MADENI AKSAM SNAYI : TURIZM A.S., : : Plaintiff, : : -v: : MTS LOGISTICS, INC., : : Defendant. : X ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 17 Civ. 7495 (JPC) ORDER JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: The Court received an email from Plaintiff declining to submit revised Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law but noting that Plaintiff’s original Proposed Findings of Fact are “more fully substantiated following the reopening of discovery.” Plaintiff’s email also included a deposition transcript of Mr. Murat Sarayli, as well as a summary of relevant excerpts. By September 30, 2022, Plaintiff shall submit a revised Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law incorporating the citations to Mr. Sarayli’s deposition transcript where relevant. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2022 New York, New York __________________________________ JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?