Daniels v. Lee

Filing 64

ORDER: Adopting REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for 60 Report and Recommendation. Having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R"), ECF No. 60, of the Honorable Robert W. Lehrburger, the Court reviewed the R&R for cl ear error and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, No. 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and mail a copy of this order to Petitioner pro se. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 9/29/2022) (ama)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-07922-AT-RWL Document 64 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRISTOPHER DANIELS, USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 9/29/2022 Petitioner, -againstWILLIAM LEE, SUPERINTENDENT. EASTERN NY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 17 Civ. 7922 (AT) (RWL) ORDER Respondent. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), ECF No. 60, of the Honorable Robert W. Lehrburger, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, No. 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). 1 The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and mail a copy of this order to Petitioner pro se. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2022 New York, New York The Court notes that Respondent asks the Court to “consider all of the arguments in [his] previously-filed memorandum of law, in addition to the reasons cited by . . . Judge Lehrburger.” ECF No. 61. The Court does not consider this to be an objection to the R&R and does not find that consideration of these alternative arguments is necessary to resolve the petition. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?