Nesbeth v. New York City Management LLC et al
Filing
234
ORDER: The Court held a lengthy discovery conference in this matter today, February 14, 2020. The parties discussed Plaintiff's Motion to Compel defendants to produce outstanding at discovery (ECF No. 219), the Defendants' resp onses (ECF Nos. 220 and 221); Defendants' letter regarding Plaintiff's outstanding discovery (ECF No. 228), and Plaintiff's response (ECF No. 232). The parties are directed to exchange the pre-settlement conference documents as outl ined during the conference. The settlement conference scheduled for Friday, February 21, 2020 will be held as planned. (ECF No. 218). After the Settlement Conference, and if it remains necessary, the Court will address the Motion for an Extension of Time to complete discovery. (ECF No. 224). (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 2/14/2020) (mro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
NICHOLAS NESBETH,
Plaintiff,
against
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 17 Civ. 8650 (JGK) (SLC)
ORDER
NEW YORK CITY MANAGEMENT LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court held a lengthy discovery conference in this matter today, February 14, 2020.
The parties discussed Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel defendants to produce outstanding at
discovery (ECF No. 219), the Defendants’ responses (ECF Nos. 220 and 221); Defendants’ letter
regarding Plaintiff’s outstanding discovery (ECF No. 228), and Plaintiff’s response (ECF No. 232).
The parties are directed to exchange the pre-settlement conference documents as
outlined during the conference. The settlement conference scheduled for Friday, February 21,
2020 will be held as planned. (ECF No. 218).
After the Settlement Conference, and if it remains necessary, the Court will address the
Motion for an Extension of Time to complete discovery. (ECF No. 224).
Dated:
New York, New York
February 14, 2020
SO ORDERED
_________________________
SARAH L. CAVE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?