Farmer v. Fzoad.com Enterprises Inc. et al

Filing 125

ORDER: Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to respond by April 29, 2021. Plaintiff may respond by mail to the Pro Se Office, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 or by email to [e-mail]. Failure to respond by t hat time may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and ECF 124 to the pro se Plaintiff., (Responses due by 4/29/2021) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 4/15/2021) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------x
RICHARD FARMER,
Plaintiff,
-againstFZOAD.COM ENTERPRISES INC., et al.,
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------x

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

17-CV-9300 (GBD) (OTW)
ORDER

ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:
On January 14, 2021, Defendants Fzoad.com Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Manhattan Eyeworks
d/b/a Chelsea Vision Associates, and David Forest Gross (collectively, the “Employer
Defendants”) and Frank Fico, Marina Kleyman, Manhattan Eyeworks, Inc, 3 Eyed Optical, Inc,
and Triple Vision Corp (the “New Employer Defendants”) moved to dismiss the allegations
against them for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(b). (ECF
124). To date, Plaintiff has not responded.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to respond by April 29, 2021. Plaintiff may respond by
mail to the Pro Se Office, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 or by email to
[e-mail]. Failure to respond by that time may result in a
recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and ECF 124 to the pro se
Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang
Ona T. Wang
United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: April 15, 2021
New York, New York

2