Rutheford v. General Motors, LLC

Filing 74

ORDER terminating (7489) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:14-md-02543-JMF; terminating (54) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:17-cv-09464-JMF; terminating (25) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:18-cv-09977-JMF; terminating (24) Moti on for Summary Judgment in case 1:18-cv-10848-JMF; terminating (22) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:19-cv-01110-JMF; terminating (21) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:19-cv-04283-JMF; terminating (22) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:19-cv-04580-JMF; terminating (21) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:19-cv-04583-JMF; terminating (20) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:19-cv-06090-JMF. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate: 1. 14-MD-2543, ECF No. 7489; 2. 17-CV- 9464, ECF No. 54; 3. 18-CV-9977, ECF No. 25; 4. 18-CV-10848, ECF No. 24; 5. 19-CV-4283, ECF No. 21; 6. 19-CV-4580, ECF No. 22; 7. 19-CV-4583, ECF No. 21; 8. 19-CV-6090, ECF No. 20; and 9. 19-CV-1110, ECF No. 22. Such termination is without prejudice to renewal in the event that any such plaintiff's claims are not resolved by the settlement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/21/20) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-md-02543-JMF et al. (yv)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------x
IN RE:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC IGNITION SWITCH LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
Rutheford v. General Motors, LLC, 17-CV-9464
Sparks v. General Motors, LLC, 18-CV-9977
Steward v. General Motors, LLC, 18-CV-10848
Manuel v. General Motors, LLC, 19-CV-4283
Cox v. General Motors, LLC, 19-CV-4580
Henry v. General Motors, LLC, 19-CV-4583
Thornton v. General Motors, LLC, 19-CV-6090
Jimison v. General Motors, LLC, 19-CV-1110
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------x

14-MD-2543 (JMF)
ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge:
On November 22, 2019, New GM filed a motion for summary judgment on the claims of
eight personal injury plaintiffs based on statutes of repose. See ECF No. 7489. In light of a
preliminary settlement agreement between the parties, the parties indicated that they are
“amenable to a process whereby the motions are withdrawn and re-filed only in the event the
claims of an applicable plaintiff are not ultimately resolved by the settlement.” See ECF No.
7625. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate:
1. 14-MD-2543, ECF No. 7489;
2. 17-CV-9464, ECF No. 54;
3. 18-CV-9977, ECF No. 25;
4. 18-CV-10848, ECF No. 24;
5. 19-CV-4283, ECF No. 21;
6. 19-CV-4580, ECF No. 22;
7. 19-CV-4583, ECF No. 21;

8. 19-CV-6090, ECF No. 20; and
9. 19-CV-1110, ECF No. 22.
Such termination is without prejudice to renewal in the event that any such plaintiff’s
claims are not resolved by the settlement.

SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 21, 2020
New York, New York

__________________________________
JESSE M. FURMAN
United States District Judge