Carter v. N.Y.C. Correctional Officer John Doe et al

Filing 110

ORDER: Accordingly, this action having been dismissed, plaintiff's December 6 request must be DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order, as well as the Order at Dkt. No. 108, to plaintiff David Carter #19A1009, Great Meadow C.F., P.O. Box 51, Comstock, NY 12821-0051. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 12/13/2019) (cf) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 12/13/2019 DAVID CARTER, Plaintiff, -against- 17-CV-09567 (JGK) (BCM) ORDER CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has received and reviewed plaintiff’s letter dated November 28 and filed December 6, 2019 (Dkt. No. 109), requesting that the Court compel defendants to arrange a viewing of the video evidence produced by defendants (see Dkt. No. 76) and seeking a telephonic settlement conference. By letter dated November 18, 2019 (Dkt. No. 107), plaintiff moved to withdraw his complaint in this matter in order to focus his attention on other pending cases in the Eastern District of New York. On December 3, 2019, Judge Koeltl granted that request, dismissed this action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. (Dkt. No. 108.) Accordingly, this action having been dismissed, plaintiff's December 6 request must be DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order, as well as the Order at Dkt. No. 108, to plaintiff David Carter #19A1009, Great Meadow C.F., P.O. Box 51, Comstock, NY 128210051. Dated: New York, New York December 13, 2019 SO ORDERED. ________________________________ BARBARA MOSES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?