Mathew et al v. SMZ Impex, Inc. et al

Filing 86

ORDER terminating 81 JOINT LETTER MOTION for Discovery Conference, Pursuant to Section 2A of the Court's Individual Rules of Practice addressed to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox from Chaya Gourarie, Esq. dated December 10, 2020. filed by Jayson Yesudasan, Miah Salim Mohammad, Abdur Howlader, Roy Mathew. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. on or before January 5, 2021, the defendants shall supplement their interrogatory answers; 2. on or before January 5, 2021, the d efendants shall either supplement their responses to the plaintiffs' document demands or, in those instances where no responsive document(s) exists, tender an affidavit(s ) to the plaintiffs indicating clearly and unambiguously that no respon sive document(s) exists; 3. on or before January 5, 2021, the defendants shall provide the plaintiffs with a fully executed Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") Form No.4506, authorizing the IRS to release taxrelated documents to the plaintiff s; 4. all discovery, of whatever nature, shall be initiated so as to be completed on or before February 16, 2021; 5. any dispositive motion shall be filed on or before March 16, 2021; 6. the response to any such motion and any reply shall be made i n accordance with Local Civil Rule 6.1 of this court; and 7. if no dispositive motion is made, the parties shall submit their joint pretrial order to the court on or before March 16, 2021. That document must conform to the requirements for such a n order that are found in the Individual Rules of Practice of the assigned district judge. This order resolves Docket Entry No. 81. ( Discovery due by 2/16/2021. Motions due by 3/16/2021. Pretrial Order due by 3/16/2021.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 12/22/2020) (va)

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-09870-JPO-KNF Document 86 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X ROY MATHEW, JAYSON YESUDASAN, ABDUR : : HOWLADER, MIAH SALIM MOHAMMAD individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs, : : : -against: SMZ IMPEX, INC., FARM AND GROCERY, INC., : : KUSUM SHAH, individually, BHARAT SHAH, : individually, JIGAR SHAH, individually, : MANGESH SHAH, individually, and JAGESH SHAH, individually,, : : Defendants. : -----------------------------------------------------------------X KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE : ORDER 17-CV-9870 (JPO)(KNF) A telephone conference was held with counsel to the respective parties on December 22, 2020. As a result of the discussion had during the conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. on or before January 5, 2021, the defendants shall supplement their interrogatory answers; 2. on or before January 5, 2021, the defendants shall either supplement their responses to the plaintiffs’ document demands or, in those instances where no responsive document(s) exists, tender an affidavit(s ) to the plaintiffs indicating clearly and unambiguously that no responsive document(s) exists; 3. on or before January 5, 2021, the defendants shall provide the plaintiffs with a fully executed Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Form No.4506, authorizing the IRS to release taxrelated documents to the plaintiffs; Case 1:17-cv-09870-JPO-KNF Document 86 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 2 4. all discovery, of whatever nature, shall be initiated so as to be completed on or before February 16, 2021; 5. any dispositive motion shall be filed on or before March 16, 2021; 6. the response to any such motion and any reply shall be made in accordance with Local Civil Rule 6.1 of this court; and 7. if no dispositive motion is made, the parties shall submit their joint pretrial order to the court on or before March 16, 2021. That document must conform to the requirements for such an order that are found in the Individual Rules of Practice of the assigned district judge. This order resolves Docket Entry No. 81. Dated: New York, New York December 22, 2020 SO ORDERED: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?