Dawkins v. Copeland et al

Filing 109

ORDER re: 108 Letter, filed by Edward C. Dawkins. The Court is in receipt of Dawkins' letter of February 29, 2020, Doc. 108. In it, he requests leave to file a surreply in response to defendants' reply in support of defendants' motion to dismiss. That request is DENIED. This motion has been pending since June 2019, and Dawkins' letter has not identified any new arguments presented by defendants in their reply that would provide good cause for this Court to grant him leave to respond. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail this order to Dawkins. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/11/2020) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWARD DAWKINS, Plaintiff, – against – COPELAND, Correctional Officer; M. HOLINESS, Grievance Coordinator; RICE, Civilian; SCULLY, Cashier Officer; S. CANADY, Grievance Coordinator; EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMS; DEPUTY WARDEN FOR PROGRAMS; DR. KATZA, Medical Director; CAROLYN SAUNDERS, Warden of North Infirmary Command; K. TILLEY, Captain; LOUNETT DAWKINS, Captain; M.D. LILIAN LWIN, Surgery; M.D. LUEDERS MENO, Surgery; M.D. SOULA PRIOVOLOS, Visiting Attended; M.D. RONALD SIMON; and M.D. IXEL CERVERA, Supervisor Resident, Defendants. ORDER 17 Civ. 9926 (ER) RAMOS, D.J.: �e Court is in receipt of Dawkins’ letter of February 29, 2020, Doc. 108. In it, he requests leave to file a surreply in response to defendants’ reply in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss. �at request is DENIED. �is motion has been pending since June 2019, and Dawkins’ letter has not identified any new arguments presented by defendants in their reply that would provide good cause for this Court to grant him leave to respond. �e Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail this order to Dawkins. It is SO ORDERED. Dated: March 11, 2020 New York, New York EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?