Dawkins v. Copeland et al
Filing
165
ORDER: granting 163 Letter Motion to Compel. Third-party witness Thomas Scully is hereby ordered to appear for a deposition on December 14, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 12/05/2022) (ama)
Case 1:17-cv-09926-ER Document 165 Filed 12/05/22 Page 1 of 2
December 1, 2022
VIA ECF
Hon. Edgardo Ramos
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re:
Third-party witness Thomas Scully is hereby ordered to
appear for a deposition on December 14, 2022. SO
ORDERED.
December 5, 2022
Dawkins v. Copeland, 17 Civ. 9926 (ER) (S.D.N.Y.)
Dear Judge Ramos:
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a) and Your Honor’s Individual Practices Rule 2.A.ii,
Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter an order compelling third-party witness
Thomas Scully to sit for a deposition within the next two weeks.1
On November 30, 2022, at the direction of Plaintiff’s counsel, a process server served a
subpoena for a deposition on Mr. Thomas Scully. See Decl. of A. Guo (“Decl.”) ¶ 2. Mr. Scully
is a material witness to this matter because, upon information and belief, he was the cashier at
the Rikers Island Central Cashier Office who handled Plaintiff’s legal mail and may be (at a
minimum) aware of circumstances surrounding Defendant Copeland’s actions in refusing to send
out Mr. Dawkins’ mail, and prison practices and procedures relating to the sending of certified
legal mail at the relevant time. See Opinion and Order dated Mar. 31, 2020, ECF No. 110 at 14
(“As Scully, the prison cashier, indicated, whether to post a letter when there were not sufficient
funds was within the discretion of the mail officer – in this case, Copeland.”); Decl. ¶ 3. Mr.
Scully also spoke to Defendant Copeland about Mr. Dawkins’ legal mail and mail policies
affecting indigent inmates, and he is mentioned in grievance decisions relating to Plaintiff’s
complaints. See Decl. ¶ 3.
As attested in the accompanying declaration, on November 30, 2022, Mr. Scully called
and left a voicemail informing Plaintiff’s counsel that he had received Plaintiff’s Fed. R. Civ. P.
30 subpoena and requested a call back. When counsel called Mr. Scully back, Mr. Scully stated
that he would refuse to appear for a deposition. Mr. Scully also informed counsel that he is
departing the country in approximately two weeks, and does not know when he will return.2 Mr.
Scully reiterated his opposition to appearing for a deposition in a second call made by Plaintiff’s
counsel on November 30, 2022. Decl. ¶¶ 4-5.
In accordance with Your Honor’s Individual Practices Rule 2.A.ii, we submit this letter motion without full
briefing and a request for a pre-motion conference because additional delay may result in the loss of Plaintiff’s right
to preserve Mr. Scully’s deposition testimony for the reasons described below.
2
Discovery is scheduled to conclude on February 10, 2023. See ECF No. 161.
1
Case 1:17-cv-09926-ER Document 165 Filed 12/05/22 Page 2 of 2
Hon. Edgardo Ramos
2
December 1, 2022
We therefore respectfully request that the Court enter an order compelling Mr. Thomas
Scully to appear for a deposition on December 14, 2022 to preserve his testimony for the record,
prior to his alleged departure from the country. Plaintiff will take Mr. Scully’s deposition at our
offices in Midtown Manhattan, or in a location amenable to the Court, including the U.S.
Courthouse if the Court deems it appropriate.3
Plaintiff has conferred with Defendant’s counsel, who does not take a position on this
motion.4
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Alicia Guo
Lisa Zornberg
Michael J. Pisem
Alicia Guo
Counsel for Plaintiff Edward C. Dawkins
cc:
Mr. David S. Thayer, Esq. (via ECF)
Mr. Thomas Scully (via Federal Express)
The parties’ counsel have conferred and are available to conduct the deposition on December 14, 2022 and
in either location.
4
Despite Mr. Scully’s previous employment for the New York City Department of Correction, Defendant’s
counsel at the New York City Law Department does not currently represent Mr. Scully. Decl. ¶ 6. Mr. Scully is of
course invited to seek counsel if he wishes.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?