Su et al v. Hailu Asian Bistro Inc. et al
Filing
54
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiff Yu Hing Su are dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. By separate order today, the Court will refer this case to the designated Magistrate Judge, Debra C. Freeman, for an inquest hearing regarding the two remaining Plaintiffs' damages.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 12/16/2020) (ama)
Case 1:17-cv-10243-MKV-DCF Document 54 Filed 12/16/20 Page 1 of 1
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 12/16/2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
YU HING SU, et al., on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
1:17-cv-10243-MKV
-against-
ORDER
HAILU ASIAN BISTRO INC., et al.,
Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
On September 16, 2020, Court held a hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment
solely against the corporate defendant Hailu Asian Bistro, Inc. [ECF No. 42]. Following that
hearing, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion in favor of two named Plaintiffs on the issue of
liability only. The Court ordered that Plaintiffs provide additional support for their damage
calculations and to show cause why the claims of Plaintiff Yu Hing Su should not be dismissed
for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs subsequently filed an affidavit of counsel providing additional
information [ECF No. 53]. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiff Yu Hing Su are dismissed without
prejudice for failure to prosecute.
By separate order today, the Court will refer this case to the designated Magistrate Judge,
Debra C. Freeman, for an inquest hearing regarding the two remaining Plaintiffs’ damages.
SO ORDERED
Dated: December 16, 2020
New York, New York
_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?