Su et al v. Hailu Asian Bistro Inc. et al
Filing
63
ORDER granting 62 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application Granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at ECF No. 62. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo on 6/13/2022) (rro)
Case 1:17-cv-10243-MKV-VF Document 63
62 Filed 06/13/22
06/10/22 Page 1 of 2
TROY LAW, PLLC
ATTORNEYS / COUNSELORS AT LAW
Tel: (718) 762-1324 troylaw@troypllc.com Fax: (718) 762-1342
41-25 Kissena Boulevard, Suite 103, Flushing, NY 11355
June 10, 2022
Via ECF
Hon. Valerie Figueredo, U.S.M.J.
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
Re:
6-13-2022
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to
close the motion at ECF No. 62.
Plaintiffs’ Request for Extension of Time to File Supplemental Affidavits to the
Court
17-cv-10243-CM Su et al v. Hailu Asian Bistro Inc. et al
Your Honor,
This office represents the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter. We write to in regards
to Your Honors order dated June 7, 2022, that plaintiffs are to provide the court with supplemental
affidavits by June 10, 2022. Plaintiffs respectfully request a three-week extension to provide the
court with the supplemental affidavits, meaning that they shall file the affidavits by July 1, 2022.
This is the parties first request and granting such request will not prejudice any party in the matter
since the parties are in default.
Plaintiffs respectfully request for a three-week extension for plaintiff’s counsel is having a
little trouble reaching their clients at this time. In addition, one of the two clients that plaintiff was
able to reach has stated that they are out of state at the moment.
Plaintiffs’ counsel reached out to both plaintiffs after the conference and didn’t really
receive a response from plaintiffs themselves. With receiving no response, plaintiffs followed up
and it was then plaintiffs counsel was informed by plaintiff Jian Ou that he is currently out of state
and in South Carolina at the moment. Plaintiffs’ counsel though have still not received a response
from plaintiff Jian Bin Lin and are currently reaching out to him to see when he can come in to
review the supplemental affidavit.
Due to plaintiff Jian Ou being out of state and plaintiffs counsel still being in the works of
getting a hold of plaintiff Jian Bin Lin, plaintiffs counsel believe that the three weeks request
should serve as more than enough time to get both plaintiffs to come to plaintiffs’ office and review
over the supplemental affidavits and have them ready to submit to the court.
For the reasons stated above, plaintiff respectfully request that the court grant plaintiffs an
additional three weeks to provide the court with their supplemental affidavits. This would mean
that the date for plaintiffs to file their supplemental affidavit will be extended from June 10, 2022
to July 1, 2022
Case 1:17-cv-10243-MKV-VF Document 63
62 Filed 06/13/22
06/10/22 Page 2 of 2
We thank court for its continued attention in this matter and sincerely apologize for not
abiding by the Order set at the conference on May 23, 2022.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ John Troy
John Troy
Attorney for Plaintiffs
JT/gd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?