Su et al v. Hailu Asian Bistro Inc. et al
Filing
72
CLERK'S AMENDED JUDGMENT re: 71 Order in favor of Jian Ou, Jian Bin Lin, Yu Hing Su against Hailu Asian Bistro Inc. in the amount of $13,570.78. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court 9;s Order dated April 20, 2023, the Court issued an Order [ECF No. 66], which "fully adopted" the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Figueredo. [ECF No. 55]. The Court's Order neglected, however, to expressly state that Plaintiffs shall be awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $13,170.78 and costs in the amount of $400, as Magistrate Judge Figueredo recommended. The Court thus clarifies that Plaintiffs are entitled to such an award. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 4/20/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)
Case 1:17-cv-10243-MKV-VF Document 72 Filed 04/20/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------X
YU HING SU, JIAN OU, and JIAN BIN LIN,
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
17 CIVIL 10243 (MKV)
AMENDED JUDGMENT
HAILU ASIAN BISTRO INC., et al.,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------X
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons
stated in the Court's Order dated April 20, 2023, the Court issued an Order [ECF No. 66], which
"fully adopted" the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Figueredo. [ECF
No. 55]. The Court's Order neglected, however, to expressly state that Plaintiffs shall be awarded
attorneys' fees in the amount of $13,170.78 and costs in the amount of $400, as Magistrate Judge
Figueredo recommended. The Court thus clarifies that Plaintiffs are entitled to such an award.
Dated: New York, New York
April 20, 2023
RUBY J. KRAJICK
_________________________
Clerk of Court
BY:
_________________________
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?