Moore v. Shahine

Filing 111

ORDER re: 110 Letter, filed by Serina Angellica Moore. The plaintiff filed a letter with the court, Docket Entry No.110, dated January 6, 2021, through which she appears to request that the Court reconsider its December 4, 2020 order denyi ng the plaintiff's motions to amend her complaint. Local Civil Rule 6.3 of this court requires that a motion for reconsideration be made 14 days after entry of the relevant determination of a court. Therefore, the plaintiff's applicatio n for reconsideration is untimely. The Rule also requires that reconsideration be requested via a Notice of Motion filed with a memorandum of law setting forth concisely the matters or controlling decisions the movant believes a court has overloo ked. The plaintiff filed neither a Notice of Motion nor a memorandum identifying the matters or controlling decisions she contends the Court overlooked. Therefore, even if the plaintiff's request for reconsideration had been made timely and properly, her failure to set forth the matters and controlling decisions she believes the Court overlooked dooms her reconsideration request. For the above-stated reasons, the plaintiff's request for reconsideration, Docket Entry No. 110, is denied with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 1/21/2021) (va) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Case 1:18-cv-00463-AT-KNF Document 111 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------------X
SERINA MOORE,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
-against:
:
:
AYMAN A. SHAHINE, M.D.,
:
Defendant.
:
--------------------------------------------------------------------X
KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

:

:

ORDER
18- CV- 463 (AT) (KNF)

The plaintiff filed a letter with the court, Docket Entry No.110, dated January 6, 2021,
through which she appears to request that the Court reconsider its December 4, 2020 order denying
the plaintiff’s motions to amend her complaint. Local Civil Rule 6.3 of this court requires that a
motion for reconsideration be made 14 days after entry of the relevant determination of a court.
Therefore, the plaintiff’s application for reconsideration is untimely. The Rule also requires that
reconsideration be requested via a Notice of Motion filed with a memorandum of law setting forth
concisely the matters or controlling decisions the movant believes a court has overlooked. The
plaintiff filed neither a Notice of Motion nor a memorandum identifying the matters or controlling
decisions she contends the Court overlooked. Therefore, even if the plaintiff’s request for
reconsideration had been made timely and properly, her failure to set forth the matters and
controlling decisions she believes the Court overlooked dooms her reconsideration request. For the
above-stated reasons, the plaintiff’s request for reconsideration, Docket Entry No. 110, is denied with
prejudice.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff.

Dated: New York, New York
January 21, 2021

SO ORDERED: