Lin v. Yuri Sushi Inc

Filing 212

ORDER GRANTING PRO BONO COUNSEL granting 210 Motion to Appoint Counsel. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Application for the Court to Request Counsel is granted. The Court advises Plaintiff that the process for securing pro bono rep resentation can be lengthy. The Court circulates pending cases to the bar at regular intervals, after which an attorney must review the case and obtain necessary clearances before contacting the Plaintiff to discuss representation. For all these re asons, some time may pass before a litigant is contacted by an attorney. The Court requests that the Plaintiff respond promptly to any outreach by a volunteer lawyer seeking to discuss possible pro bono representation. As the Court relies on volun teers, there is no guarantee that a volunteer attorney will decide to take the case or that, should the services of the volunteer be declined, the court will locate another. In either instance, plaintiff should be prepared to proceed with the case pro se. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 9/25/2024) (ks) Transmission to Office of Pro Se Litigation for processing.