Giamella et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al

Filing 79

MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting 78 Letter Motion to Consolidate Cases. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 1/25/2021) (kv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------JODYLYNN GIAMELLA : and JOHN GIAMELLA, : : Plaintiffs, : : -against: : WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. : and JOHN DOES 1-25, : : Defendants. : --------------------------------------------------------------- Case No. 18-cv-0645 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Plaintiffs, by the undersigned attorney, set forth the following as and for their Notice of Related Case pursuant to S.D.N.Y. LCivR 1.6(a): To the best of Plaintiffs’ knowledge, information and belief, this action arises from a common nucleus of operative fact with MDL Case No. 4:20-md-2949-KGB In Re: Profemur Hip Implant Products Liability, United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, and actions brought under or removed to such MDL. On January 21, 2021 Conditional Transfer Order [CTO-13] was entered by the Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation, transferring this case to the above referenced MDL, if no opposition is filed by January 28, 2021. On January 21, 2021 that Conditional Transfer Order [CTO-13] was entered in the E.D. of Arkansas, In Re: Profemur Hip Implant Products Liability, 4:20-md-2949, Doc. No. 198, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Barring an objection to this transfer, which is not expected, this matter will shortly be ordered to be transferred MDL 2949 for further proceedings in that court, Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of January 2021. s/ Stephen A. Weingrad Stephen A. Weingrad Law Offices of Weingrad & Weingrad, P.C. 233 East 35th Street, # 1 New York, NY 10016 Telephone: 212-244-4187 Facsimile: 914-462-4426 stephenweingrad@hotmail.com Attorney for Plaintiffs 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?