Pedro Gomez v. BB Management of New York Corp., and Aaron Bauer

Filing 36

MEMORANDUM ORDER: granting 35 Motion for Settlement. The Court has carefully considered the parties' joint submission, which includes a sworn declaration by Plaintiff's attorney, Abdul Karim Hassan, and the parties' fully executed s ettlement agreement. (See Docket Entry No. 35.) In light of the factors articulated above, as well as the Court's review of the agreement and the parties' representations as set forth in their motion for settlement approval, the Court finds that the proposed settlement agreement, including the attorneys' fees and expense award component, is fair and reasonable and that it satisfies the requirements of Cheeks. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal by January 4, 2019. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/11/2018) (ama)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X PEDRO GOMEZ, Plaintiff, -v- No. 18-CV-850-LTS-BCM BB MANAGEMENT OF NEW YORK CORP. and AARON BAUER, Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------X MEMORANDUM ORDER The Court has received and reviewed the parties’ joint request for approval of the proposed settlement agreement in this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) case. (See Docket Entry No. 35.) “[B]efore a district court enters judgment [on an FLSA settlement agreement], it must scrutinize the settlement agreement to determine that the settlement is fair and reasonable.” Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “The ultimate question is whether the proposed settlement reflects a fair and reasonable compromise of disputed issues rather than a mere waiver of statutory rights brought about by an employer’s overreaching.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). In determining whether a settlement is fair and reasonable, a court considers the totality of the circumstances, encompassing a range of factors including: “(1) the plaintiff’s range of possible recovery; (2) the extent to which the settlement will enable the parties to avoid anticipated burdens and expenses in establishing their respective claims and defenses; (3) the seriousness of the litigation risks faced by the parties; (4) whether the settlement agreement is the product of arm’s-length bargaining between experienced counsel; and (5) the possibility of fraud or collusion.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). GOMEZ FLSA SETTLEMENT APPROVAL.DOCX VERSION DECEMBER 11, 2018 1 “Generally, there is a strong presumption in favor of finding a settlement fair, as the Court is generally not in as good a position as the parties to determine the reasonableness of an FLSA settlement.” Lliguichuzhca v. Cinema 60, LLC, 948 F. Supp. 2d 362, 365 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Moreover, following the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015), parties may not privately settle FLSA claims without approval of either the district court or the Department of Labor. In dicta in Cheeks, the Second Circuit expressed hesitation with respect to the validity of settlement agreements containing confidentiality provisions, general releases or excessive attorneys’ fees. See generally id. The Court has carefully considered the parties’ joint submission, which includes a sworn declaration by Plaintiff’s attorney, Abdul Karim Hassan, and the parties’ fully executed settlement agreement. (See Docket Entry No. 35.) In light of the factors articulated above, as well as the Court’s review of the agreement and the parties’ representations as set forth in their motion for settlement approval, the Court finds that the proposed settlement agreement, including the attorneys’ fees and expense award component, is fair and reasonable and that it satisfies the requirements of Cheeks. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal by January 4, 2019. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York December 11, 2018 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain . LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN United States District Judge GOMEZ FLSA SETTLEMENT APPROVAL.DOCX VERSION DECEMBER 11, 2018 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?