Kairam, M.D. v. West Side GI, LLC

Filing 165

ORDER granting 164 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to file their response to the Consolidated Complaint. Application Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 8/26/2021) (js)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-01005-AT-SDA Document 165 Filed 08/26/21 Page 1 of 2 RYAN SESTACK RSESTACK@GRSM.COM JEFFREY CAMHI JCAMHI@GRSM.COM ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1 BATTERY PARK PLAZA, 28TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10004 WWW .GRSM.COM CHRISTOPHER COYNE CCOYNE@GRSM.COM August 25, 2021 VIA ECF Honorable Stewart D. Aaron United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Kairam v. West Side GI, LLC Civil Action Number 1:18-cv-1005 (AT) (SDA) Dear Judge Aaron: I am an attorney with Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, counsel for defendants WestSide GI, LLC (“WSGI”), Peter Distler, and Ricardo Pou, in the above-referenced consolidated action. Defendants write to respectfully request a 2-week extension of time, from August 30, to September 13, 2021, to file their response to the Consolidated Complaint, filed July 15, 2021 (Docket No. 161). This is the second request for an extension of time to respond to the Consolidated Complaint. Defendants requested plaintiff’s consent to this extension, and plaintiff indicated that she neither consents nor objects to this request. Defendants request this extension of time in order to complete their analysis of the Consolidated Complaint and finalize their response to this pleading. The Consolidated Complaint is 53-pages long, with 220 paragraphs and 28 separate and distinct causes of action. Moreover, and as the Court is aware, many of these claims have been subject to extensive motion practice, including an appeal to the Second Circuit and remand to the district court. This case entails an extremely complicated procedural history associated with the three separate matters that existed prior to consolidation, and thus requires a significant amount of time to review, analyze, and develop a response. In addition, the undersigned has had numerous deadlines in other matters over the past few weeks, including, among other things, imminent motion deadlines in proceedings before the New York State Supreme Court, Bronx County, and United States District Court, Eastern District of New York. Given the complexity of this matter and these separate obligations in other matters, Defendants are compelled to request this brief 2-week extension of time. As such, Defendants respectfully request this extension of time, until September 13, 2021, 1 Case 1:18-cv-01005-AT-SDA Document 165 Filed 08/26/21 Page 2 of 2 to respond to the Consolidated Complaint. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully submitted, GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP Christopher Coyne Christopher Coyne, Esq. cc. 1167938/60819053v.1 Ryan Sestack Esq. (via email & ECF) Jeffrey Camhi, Esq. (via email & ECF) Elizabeth Shieldkret, Esq. (via ECF) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?